<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "D:\journal-publishing-dtd-2.0\journalpublishing.dtd">
<article>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">ijaeb</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">ijaeb</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ijaeb</journal-id>
<journal-title>INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE, ENVIRONMENT AND BIOTECHNOLOGY</journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1974-1712</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2230-732X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Association of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>New Delhi, India</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="other">ijaeb-13-1-009</article-id>
<doi-group>
<article-doi><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://dx.doi.org/10.30954/0974-1712.1.2020.8">10.30954/0974-1712.1.2020.8</ext-link></article-doi>
</doi-group>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Pathology</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Management of <italic>Phytophthora capsici</italic> Infection in Black Pepper (<italic>Piper nigrum</italic> L.) using New Generation Fungicides and Biopesticide</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib id="author-1"><name><surname>Rini</surname><given-names>C.R.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib id="author-2"><name><surname>Remya</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><deptname>Agricultural Research Station, Thiruvalla</deptname>, <instname>Kerala Agricultural University</instname>, <inststate>Kerala</inststate>, <instcountry>India</instcountry></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><deptname>Pepper Research Station, Panniyur</deptname>, <instname>Kerala Agricultural University</instname>, <inststate>Kerala</inststate>, <instcountry>India</instcountry></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1"><sup>*</sup>Corresponding author: <email>crrini@gmail.com</email> (<bold>ORCID ID:</bold> 0000-0001-7531-896X)</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>3</month>
<year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>71</fpage>
<lpage>74</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2019-09-20">
<day>20</day>
<month>9</month>
<year>2019</year>
</date>
<date date-type="Revised" iso-8601-date="2020-01-23">
<day>23</day>
<month>1</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2020-02-29">
<day>29</day>
<month>2</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; Association of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, New Delhi India</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Association of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, New Delhi India</copyright-holder>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="ijaeb-13-1-009.pdf"></self-uri>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>A field study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different new generation fungicides and biopesticide against <italic>Phytophthora capsici</italic> in black pepper. Five commercial fungicides and a biopesticide were tested and natural infection due to <italic>P. capsici</italic> was recorded. Disease indexing was done by visual observation on leaf blight, spike infection, leaf shedding and yellowing of vines. Among the different fungicides, spraying and drenching with Fenamidone 10WDG + Mancozeb 50WDG @ 0.2% was found to be the most effective with 12.4% disease intensity. It was followed by Copper hydroxide 77 WP @ 0.2% with 17.8% disease intensity. Dimethomorph 9WP + Mancozeb 60WP and Cymoxanil 8WP + Mancozeb 64WP were also effective against Phytophthora infection and found better than the existing practice of spraying Bordeaux mixture and drenching Copper oxy chloride. Soil application of talc based formulation of PGPM mix @ 50 g/vine and foliar spray at 2% concentration also resulted in considerable reduction in the severity of Phytophthora infection in black pepper.</p>
<p><bold>Highlights</bold></p>
<p><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="pg01.jpg"/> Application of Fenamidone 10WDG + Mancozeb 50WDG or Copper hydroxide 77 WP @ 0.2% during 1<sup>st</sup> week of June, August and October can effectively manage Phtophthora foot rot in black pepper</p>
<p><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="pg01.jpg"/> Other effective fungicides include 0.2% Dimethomorph 9WP + Mancozeb 60WP and Cymoxanil 8WP + Mancozeb 64WP</p>
<p><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="pg01.jpg"/> Repetitive application of Plant growth promoting microorganisms on to the plant and to the rhizosphere soil will provide better protection against <italic>Phytophthora capsici</italic> in black pepper.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<title>Keywords</title>
<kwd>Black pepper</kwd>
<kwd>Phytophthora foot rot</kwd>
<kwd>New generation fungicides</kwd>
<kwd>Biopesticides</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="1"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="9"/>
<page-count count="15"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<p>Black pepper (<italic>Piper nigrum</italic> L.), the king of spices is a traditional, historic spice crop which has been under cultivation since ancient times in India. Production of black pepper has significantly been affected by foot rot disease caused by <italic>Phytophthora capsici</italic> (Ravindran 2000). Loss of vines due to this disease is generally 5-20% (Manohara et al. 2004) which may go even upto 95% loss in individual gardens (Anandaraj <italic>et al</italic>. 1989). P. capsici is a polycyclic oomycete plant pathogen against which host resistance is not easily available. Hence an integrated approach involving cultural, biological and chemical control is necessary for successful management of this disease (Anandaraj 2000). Yet chemical control remained as the main focus of management strategy. Prophylactic application of fungicides such as copper based fungicides, metalaxyl and phosphonates are recommended for foot rot management (KAU, 2011 and Anandaraj 2000). However, continuous application of a single molecule of fungicide like Metalaxyl resulted in emergence of resistant isolates of pathogen (Gisi and Cohen 1996) and hence combination products like Metalaxyl-Mancozeb are being used (Ramachandran <italic>et al</italic>. 1991). During heavy monsoon contact fungicides like Copper oxychloride do not give satisfactory control of the disease particularly after the onset of disease (KFRI, 1996). Therefore there is a definite need for more fungicides to incorporate into the integrated disease management plan which can bring down the pathogen population in soil and can control leaf, stem, spike, root and collar infections. Several novel fungicides have been developed in the past two decades with known activity against this oomycete pathogen (Thind 2011). Keeping in view the above mentioned facts, the present study was conducted with the objective of identifying technologies including new generation fungicides and biopesticide for managing Phytophthora infection in black pepper plantations.</p>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<p>The trial was conducted for three years during 2013-14 to 2015-16 at Pepper Research Station, Panniyur. 10 years old black pepper vines of variety Panniyur 1was chosen for the experiment as this variety is highly susceptible to <italic>Phytophthora capsici</italic>. The treatments included five commercial fungicides viz., Sectin (Fenamidone 10WDG + Mancozeb 50WDG), Acrobat Mz (Dimethomorph 9WP + Mancozeb 60WP), Curzate M8 (Cymoxanil 8WP + Mancozeb 64WP), Bordeaux Mixture 1% + Fytran (Copper oxychloride 50WP), Kocide (Copper hydroxide 77 WP), consortium of Plant Growth Promoting Microorganisms (PGPM) and a control. Consortium of PGPM, a fungal-bacterial mix developed by Kerala Agricultural University consisted of four different microorganisms <italic>viz., Trichoderma viride, Trichoderma harzianum, Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus megatherium</italic>. The experiment was laid out in Randomized block design and each treatment was replicated four times with four plants per replication. The plants were spaced at 4 × 2m, and all agronomic practices as per KAU (2011) were adopted. Spraying and drenching with the fungicides were done during 1st week of June (onset of SW monsoon), August (Mid monsoon) and October (onset of NE monsoon) in each year. Natural infection due to Phytophthora attack was recorded at monthly intervals for four months of treatment application i.e. July, August, September and October of all the three years. Disease indexing was done by visual observation on leaf blight, spike infection, leaf shedding and yellowing of vines. Based on the infected area, the experimental plants were rated and had given scores using a score chart of 0-5 scale. On the 0-5 scale, 0 = No infection; 1 = 1-10% infection; 2 = 11-25% infection; 3 = 26-50% infection; 4 = 51-75% infection and 5 = more than 75% infection. Percent disease intensity was calculated using the following formula and statistically analyzed.</p>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="figi_pg02.jpg"/>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>Results and Discussion</title>
<p>Results showed that all the fungicides were significantly superior over control in controlling Phytophthora infection in black pepper (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). In 2013-14, application of Fenamidone + Mancozeb, Dimethomorph + Mancozeb, Cymoxanil + Mancozeb and Copper hydroxide were highly effective and superior over control in reducing Phytophthora infection on leaves. The disease intensity recorded in unprotected control plants was 30.3% whereas, with the application of these fungicides the intensity of disease was much reduced in the range of 6.7 to 9.3% i.e., around 69 to 78% less than control. Besides, these fungicides were found more effective than the existing recommendation wherein the plants were sprayed with Bordeaux mixture 1% and drenched with Copper oxy chloride @ 0.2%. Application of PGPM also recorded comparatively less disease (24.3%) than the control plants. In 2014-15, plants treated with Fenamidone + Mancozeb and Copper hydroxide @ 0.2% recorded the minimum disease of 10.3 and 11% respectively which was significantly low when compared to control. Application of PGPM was equally effective as that of the above fungicides with 10.7% disease intensity. It was closely followed by the application of Dimethomorph + Mancozeb and Cymoxanil + Mancozeb. The effects of these fungicides and biopesticide were superior to existing practice of Bordeaux mixture spray + Copper oxy chloride drench similar to the previous year’s result. Disease severity during 2015-16, was comparatively higher than the previous years. However a similar trend in disease control was noticed with the fungicides tested recording minimum infection in the treatment with Fenamidone + Mancozeb having percent disease intensity (PDI) 17.5% followed by Copper hydroxide (PDI 34.2%) and Dimethomorph + Mancozeb (PDI 37.1%). Application of PGPM also recorded very less infection (PDI 40%) which was better than Bordeaux mixture spray + Copper oxy chloride drench (49.6% PDI) and the untreated control (54.2% PDI). Pooled analysis of the three year data revealed that, all the tested fungicides reduced the disease significantly as evidenced by the lower PDI. In all the three years, the best treatment observed was Fenamidone + Mancozeb which reduced the disease by 63.7% than the control. Next best treatment observed was Copper hydroxide which resulted in 48% less disease than the control. Dimethomorph + Mancozeb and Cymoxanil + Mancozeb were found better than the existing recommendation of Bordeaux mixture spray and Copper oxy chloride drench and was statistically on par with Copper hydroxide. The effect of Bordeaux mixture and copper oxy chloride in Phytophthora foot rot management is well documented (Ramachandran <italic>et al</italic>. 1991; Anandaraj and Sarma 1995., KAU, 2011.) and the package has been widely adopted in Kerala. However a number of new fungicide molecules with different mode of action have been evaluated and reported against different species of <italic>Phytophthora</italic> (Anjaneya <italic>et al</italic>. 2015; Padmaja <italic>et al</italic>. 2015). Michael and Martin (2008) reported better survival of pepper plants in soil infested with P. capsici when soil was treated with Reason (fenamidone) + Previcur Flex (propamocarb) and Dimethomorph. In the present study, soil application of consortium of PGPM @ 50g/vine + spraying @ 2% concentration which was repeated twice during the season also resulted in considerable reduction in the severity of Phytophthora infection in black pepper. Similar report on use of biocontrol agents in combination for better disease control was made by Anith and Manomohandas (2001) and Manoranjitham <italic>et al</italic>. (2001). The fungal – bacterial combination may exert any of their antagonistic mechanisms individually or more than one of them acting simultaneously in synergistic manner for better disease suppression.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The data from this study suggest that fungicides like Fenamidone 10WDG + Mancozeb 50 WDG (Sectin), Copper hydroxide 77 WP (Kocide), Dimethomorph 9WP + Mancozeb 60 WP (Acrobat Mz) and Cymoxanil 8WP + Mancozeb 64WP (Curzate M8) that are not currently used in black pepper could be included as effective components of a management program against Phytophthora capsici. It is well clear that repetitive application of Plant growth promoting microorganisms on to the plant and to the rhizosphere soil will helps in providing better protection against the dreadful plant pathogen Phytophthora capsici in black pepper.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>The financial support provided by RKVY and other facilities given by Kerala Agricultural University for conducting the work is gratefully acknowledged here.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>REFERENCES</title>
<ref id="b1"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<string-name><surname>Anandaraj</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Abraham</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></string-name> 
<string-name><surname>Balakrishnan</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>
</person-group>
<year>1989</year>.
<article-title>Crop loss due to foot rot disease of black pepper</article-title>.
<source>Indian Phytopathol.,</source>
<volume>42</volume>: 
<fpage>473</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>476</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="b2"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<string-name><surname>Anandaraj</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></string-name> 
<string-name><surname>Sarma</surname><given-names>Y.R.</given-names></string-name>
</person-group>
<year>1995</year>.
<article-title>Diseases of black pepper (<italic>Piper nigrum</italic> L.) and their management</article-title>.
<source>J. Spices and Aromatic Crops,</source>
<volume>4</volume>:
<fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="b3"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<string-name><surname>Anandaraj</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>
</person-group>
<year>2000</year>.
<article-title>Diseases of black pepper</article-title>.
<source>In Black Pepper (<italic>Piper nigrum</italic>)</source>.
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<string-name><surname>Ravindran</surname><given-names>P. N.</given-names></string-name></person-group> 
(ed.).
<publisher-name>Harwood Academic Publishers</publisher-name>:
<publisher-loc>Amsterdam, The Netherlands</publisher-loc>, pp.
<fpage>245</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>275</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="b4"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<string-name><surname>Anith</surname><given-names>K.N.</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Manomohandas</surname><given-names>T.P.</given-names></string-name>
</person-group>
<year>2001</year>.
<article-title>Combined application of <italic>Trichoderma harzianum</italic> and <italic>Alcaligenes</italic> sp. strain AMB 8 for controlling nursery rot disease of black pepper</article-title>.
<source>Indian Phytopathol.,</source>
<volume>54</volume>:
<fpage>335</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>339</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="b5"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<string-name><surname>Anjaneya</surname><given-names>Reddy B.</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Sreenath</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Rekha</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Devappa</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></string-name>
</person-group>
<year>2015</year>.
<article-title>Field efficacy of new fungicide molecules against late blight of potato in Southern Karnataka. Abs</article-title>.
<source>In 3<sup>rd</sup> International Symposium on <italic>Phytophthora:</italic> Taxonomy, Genomics, Pathogenicity, Resistance and Disease Management</source>,
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<string-name><surname>Chowdappa</surname><given-names>P</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Vinayaka</surname><given-names>Hegde</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Muralikrishna</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></string-name>
</person-group>
(eds.)
<publisher-name>ICAR-IIHR</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Bengaluru</publisher-loc>
<day>9-12</day>,
<month>September</month>,
<year>2015</year> pp.
<fpage>54</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="b6"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<string-name><surname>Gisi</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Cohen</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></string-name>
</person-group>
<year>1996</year>.
<article-title>Resistance to phenylamide fungicides - A case study with <italic>Phytophthora infestans</italic> involving mating type and race structure</article-title>.
<source>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.,</source>
<volume>34</volume>:
<fpage>549</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>572</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="b7"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>KAU</collab>,
<year>2011</year>.
<article-title>Package of Practices Recommendations: Crops</article-title>.
<edition>14th edition</edition>.
<publisher-name>Directorate of Extension, Kerala Agricultural University</publisher-name>,
<publisher-loc>Thrissur</publisher-loc>, pp.
<fpage>360</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="b8"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>KFRI</collab>,
<year>1996</year>.
<article-title>Fungicidal management of quick wilt disease of black pepper in forest plantations</article-title>.
<source>KFRI Research Report 111</source>,
<publisher-name>Kerala Forest Research Institute</publisher-name>,
<publisher-loc>Peechi, Thrissur</publisher-loc>, pp.
<fpage>12</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="b9"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<string-name><surname>Manohara</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Mulya</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Wahyuno</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>
</person-group>
<year>2004</year>.
<article-title><italic>Phytophthora</italic> disease on black pepper and the control measures</article-title>.
<source>Focus on pepper,</source>
<volume>1</volume>:
<fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="b10"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<string-name><surname>Manoranjitham</surname><given-names>S.K.</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Prakasam</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Rajappan</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>
</person-group>
<year>2001</year>.
<article-title>Biocontrol of damping off of tomato caused by <italic>Pythium aphanidermatum</italic></article-title>.
<source>Indian Phytopathol.,</source>
<volume>54</volume>:
<fpage>59</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>61</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="b11"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<string-name><surname>Michael</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Matheron</surname></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>Porchas</given-names></string-name>
</person-group>
<year>2008</year>.
<article-title>Efficacy of new fungicides as potential management tools for Phytophthora crown and root rot on pepper plants</article-title>.
<source>Vegetable Report</source>, pp.
<fpage>152</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="b12"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<string-name><surname>Padmaja</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Kanaka</surname><given-names>Mahalakshmi B.</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Uma</surname><given-names>Devi G.</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Sridevi</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>
</person-group>
<year>2015</year>.
<article-title>Studies on efficacy of fungicides and their dosage against <italic>Phytophthora colocasiae</italic> causing leaf blight of Taro Abs</article-title>.
<conf-name>In 3rd International Symposium on Phytophthora : Taxonomy, Genomics, Pathogenicity, Resistance and Disease Management</conf-name>,
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<string-name><surname>Chowdappa</surname><given-names>P</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Vinayaka</surname><given-names>Hegde</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Muralikrishna</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></string-name>
</person-group>
(eds.)
<publisher-name>ICAR-IIHR</publisher-name>,
<publisher-loc>Bengaluru</publisher-loc>,
<day>9-12</day>,
<month>September</month>,
<year>2015</year>, pp.
<fpage>49</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="b13"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<string-name><surname>Ramachandran</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Sarma</surname><given-names>Y.R.</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Anadaraj</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>
</person-group>
<year>1991</year>.
<article-title>Management of Phytophthora infection in black pepper</article-title>.
In:
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<string-name><surname>Sarma</surname><given-names>Y. R.</given-names></string-name>
<string-name><surname>Premkumar</surname></string-name>
</person-group>
(Eds)
<source>Diseases of Black Pepper</source>.
<conf-name>In Proc. International Workshop on Joint Research for the Control of Black Pepper Diseases</conf-name>.
<day>27-28</day>
<month>October</month>
<year>1988</year>,
<publisher-loc>Goa, India</publisher-loc>, pp.
<fpage>158</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>174</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="b14"><label>14.</label><citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<string-name><surname>Ravindran</surname><given-names>P.N.</given-names></string-name>
</person-group>
<year>2000</year>.
<article-title>Constraints and yield gaps in Black pepper</article-title>.
<source>In Black Pepper (Piper nigrum)</source>.
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<string-name><surname>Ravindran</surname><given-names>P. N.</given-names></string-name>
</person-group>
(ed.).
<publisher-name>Harwood Academic Publishers</publisher-name>:
<publisher-loc>Amsterdam, The Netherlands</publisher-loc>, pp.
<fpage>497</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>504</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="b15"><label>15.</label><citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<string-name><surname>Thind</surname><given-names>T.S.</given-names></string-name>
</person-group>
<year>2011</year>.
<article-title>New generation anti - oomycete fungicides: Prospects and limitations</article-title>.
<source>Pl. Dis. Res.,</source>
<volume>26</volume>:
<fpage>159</fpage>.</citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>