Kumari et al.
notȱ affectedȱ significantlyȱ byȱ differentȱ applicationȱ appliedȱmetribuzinȱatȱthreeȱlevelsȱi.e.ȱ0.25ȱkg.ȱha -1
ratesȱofȱmetribuzin.
0.50ȱkg.ȱha -1 ȱandȱ1.00ȱkg.ȱha -1 ȱwereȱ32.63%,ȱ24.69%ȱ
andȱ11.36%ȱrespectivelyȱatȱthreeȱdaysȱafterȱherbicideȱ
Table 1. Effect of different doses of metribuzin on plant height,
application.ȱTheȱdataȱon%ȱdissipationȱofȱherbicidesȱ
yield attributes and tuber yield of potato
revealedȱ atȱ threeȱ levelsȱ ofȱ metribuzinȱ applicationȱ
i.e.ȱ 0.25,ȱ 0.50ȱ andȱ 1.00ȱ kg.ha -1 ȱ approximatelyȱ 17.9,ȱ
Plant
No. of
Potato
Plant
19.21ȱ andȱ 27.73%ȱ ofȱ metribuzinȱ remainedȱ inȱ soilȱ
Treatments
population haulms/ tuber yield
(cm)
(No /m)
plant
(q. ha -1 )
respectivelyȱatȱ15ȱdaysȱafterȱherbicideȱapplication.
Metribuzin 0.25
55.3
4.7
3.5
200.9
Atȱ 45ȱ daysȱ afterȱ herbicideȱ application,ȱ inȱ allȱ
kg. ha -1
herbicideȱ appliedȱ treatmentsȱ moreȱ thanȱ 90%ȱ
Metribuzin
50
59.8
5.0
4.0
245.2
ofȱ herbicideȱ dissipated.ȱ Perȱ centȱ dissipationȱ ofȱ
kg. ha -1
metribuzinȱ wasȱ 94.20%ȱ inȱ metribuzinȱ 0.50ȱ kgȱ ha -1
Metribuzin 1.00
62.9
5.0
3.7
216.7
followedȱ byȱ metribuzinȱ 0.25ȱ kg.ȱ ha -1 ȱ (91.57%)ȱ andȱ
kg. ha -1
metribuzin1.00ȱkg.ha -1 ȱ(90.90%).ȱTheȱresiduesȱwereȱ
Control
55.8
5.0
3.3
119.9
belowȱdetectableȱlevelȱforȱmetribuzinȱ@ȱ0.25ȱkg.ȱha -1
CD(P=0.05)
NS
NS
NS
35.2
atȱ 75ȱ daysȱ afterȱ herbicideȱ applicationȱ indicatingȱ
thatȱ appliedȱ metribuzinȱ mightȱ haveȱ dissipatedȱ
Weedsȱ inȱ unweededȱ checkȱ (control)ȱ reducedȱ theȱ toȱ 100%ȱ completely.ȱ Howeverȱ theȱ concentrationȱ
tuberȱ yieldȱ byȱ 51.1%ȱ overȱ theȱ bestȱ treatmentȱ i.e.ȱ ofȱ metribuzinȱ 0.50ȱ kg.ȱ ha -1 ȱ wasȱ 0.005ȱ g.ȱ g -1 ȱ andȱ
metribuzinȱ 0.5ȱ kg.ȱ ha -1 .ȱ Theȱ betterȱ tuberȱ yieldȱ i.e.ȱ forȱ metribuzinȱ 1.00ȱ kg.ȱ ha -1 ȱ wasȱ 0.022ȱ g.ȱ g -1 .ȱ Theȱ
245.2ȱq.ȱha -1 ȱowedȱtoȱsuperiorȱweedȱcontrolȱdueȱtoȱ corresponding%ȱdissipationȱforȱmetribuzinȱ0.25ȱkg.ȱ
metribuzinȱappliedȱatȱrateȱofȱ0.5ȱkg.ȱha -1ȱ metribuzinȱ ha -1 ,ȱ 0.50ȱ kg.ȱ ha -1 ,ȱ 1.00ȱ kg.ȱ ha -1 ȱ wasȱ100,ȱ98.47ȱ andȱ
1ȱkg.ȱha -1ȱ beingȱstatisticallyȱatȱparȱwithȱmetribuzinȱ 96.60%ȱ respectively.ȱ Theȱ residuesȱ ofȱ metribuzinȱ
0.25ȱ kg.ha -1ȱ wasȱ theȱ nextȱ bestȱ treatment.ȱ Howeverȱ exhibitedȱaȱdecliningȱpatternȱasȱaȱfunctionȱofȱtime.ȱAȱ
unweededȱcheckȱ(control)ȱresultedȱintoȱsignificantlyȱ perusalȱofȱdataȱasȱevidentȱinȱ(Tableȱ2)ȱrevealedȱthatȱ
lowestȱyieldȱofȱpotatoȱtubers.
metribuzinȱ atȱ threeȱ applicationȱ ratesȱ i.e.ȱ 0.25,ȱ 0.50ȱ
Theȱmethodȱvalidatedȱforȱmetribuzinȱestimationȱbyȱ
andȱ1.00ȱkg.ȱha -1 ȱpersistedȱinȱsoilȱupȱtoȱ60,ȱ75ȱandȱ
gasȱ chromatographyȱ (GC)ȱ gaveȱ theȱ retentionȱ timeȱ
120ȱdaysȱrespectively.ȱThisȱindicatesȱthatȱmetribuzinȱ
ofȱ referenceȱ materialȱ 5.9ȱ minutes.ȱ Theȱ recoveryȱ
atȱhigherȱdosesȱpersistedȱinȱsoilȱforȱlongerȱdurationȱ
experimentȱ conductedȱ withȱ soilȱ andȱ potatoȱ tubersȱ
thanȱlowerȱdoses.ȱMetribuzinȱdidȱnotȱleaveȱresiduesȱ
showedȱ recoveryȱ percentageȱ aboveȱ 80%.ȱ Theȱ
inȱsoilsȱbeyondȱharvestȱofȱtheȱcropȱatȱanyȱofȱappliedȱ
recoveriesȱ ofȱ metribuzinȱ atȱ differentȱ concentrationȱ
doses.ȱ Further,ȱ theȱ examinationȱ ofȱ dataȱ (Tableȱ 2)ȱ
levelsȱwereȱwellȱwithinȱacceptableȱlimits,ȱconfirmingȱ
depictsȱthatȱrateȱofȱdissipationȱofȱmetribuzinȱinȱsoilȱ
aȱgoodȱrepeatabilityȱofȱtheȱmethod.ȱTheȱassayȱresultsȱ
wasȱrapidȱwhichȱcouldȱbeȱattributedȱtoȱtheȱfavourableȱ
ofȱ commercialȱ formulationsȱ Sencorȱ 70%ȱ (WP)ȱ
physico-chemicalȱ parametersȱ likeȱ volatilization,ȱ
revealedȱthatȱtheȱactiveȱingredientȱwasȱ69.3%ȱwithȱ
vapourȱ pressure,ȱ heavyȱ rainfall,ȱ favourableȱ
±ȱ0.3ȱstandardȱdeviation.ȱMetribuzinȱresiduesȱand%ȱ
temperature,ȱhighȱorganicȱmatterȱcontentȱandȱheavyȱ
dissipationȱdataȱinȱsoilȱatȱdifferentȱtimeȱintervalsȱasȱ
textureȱofȱsoil.
detectedȱbyȱGCȱareȱpresentedȱinȱTableȱ2.ȱTheȱinitialȱ (Audusȱ 1964,ȱ Sheetsȱ 1962,ȱ Khouryȱ et al. 2003)ȱ alsoȱ
depositsȱ ofȱ metribuzinȱ inȱ soilȱ immediatelyȱ afterȱ reportedȱ veryȱ intenseȱ andȱ rapidȱ degradationȱ ofȱ
applicationȱofȱmetribuzinȱ0.25,ȱ0.50ȱandȱ1.00ȱkg.ha -1
metribuzinȱ andȱ concludedȱ fromȱ theȱ studyȱ thatȱ
wereȱ0.190,ȱ0.328,ȱ0.660ȱandȱafterȱ3ȱdaysȱofȱherbicideȱ leachingȱbyȱrainfallȱandȱdegradationȱisȱimportantȱinȱ
applicationȱreachedȱtoȱ0.128,ȱ0.247ȱandȱ0.585ȱg.ȱg -1
disappearanceȱofȱmetribuzinȱfromȱsoil.
respectively.ȱ Theȱ correspondingȱ perȱ centȱ lossesȱ ofȱ
452