Prakash et al.
for 10 minutes and finally once again extracted with SEVEG. The supernatant was
transferred to sterile glass corex tubes and DNA was precipitated with 2.0 volume
of chilled ethanol. The DNA was recovered by spooling. The recovered DNA was
washed with 70% ethanol and air dried and resuspended in 500 µl of TE-buffer
[10mM Tris-HCl (pH-8.0),1nM EDTA] and stored at 4°C until used. The DNA
was quantified both by spectrophotometric method and on 0.8% agarose gel. The
stock solution was diluted to uniform concentration of 10ng/µl.
DNA marker analysis
PCR reactions were performed according to the protocol of Williams et al., (1990).
The PCR amplification was carried in a 0.2 ml tube in GeneAmp 9700 PCR system
(Applied Biosystems, U.S.A.) with 20µl reaction volumes containing 20 mM Tris-
HCl (pH-8.4), 50mM KCl, 2mM MgCl 2, 0.2 µM primer, 0.1 mM of each of dATP,
dTTP, dCTP, dGTP, 0.5U of taq DNA. The random polymerase (Bangalore Genei)
and 20ng of template DNA was used. Five random primers covering most of the
chromosomes were obtained from Operon Technologies Ltd., Almada, U.S.A.
(Table 1). Amplification reactions were carried out by following cycle profiles:
1 cycle at 93°C for 2 min followed by 45 cycles at 93°C for 1min. 35°C for
1 min., 72°C for 2 min. and a final 7 min. extension at 72°C. PCR products were
electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gel (Sambrook et al., 1989) in 1x TAE, stained
in ethidium bromide and the gel image was recorded using the gel-documentation
system.
table 1: List of RaPD primers used in the study and marker polymorphism
No. of
total no. of
% Poly-
Primer
Sequence (5’ – 3’)
Polymorphic
amplicons
morphism
amplicons
OPA – 01
CAGGCCCTTC
8
3
37.5
OPA – 02
TGCCGAGCTG
7
2
28.6
OPA – 03
AGTCAGCCAC
8
4
50.0
OPA – 04
AATGGGGCTG
6
3
50.0
OPA – 07
GAAACGGGTG
4
1
25.0
total
33
13
39.39
Inheritance and diversity analysis
The bending patterns generated by RAPD markers were scored as ‘1’ for the
presence of amplicons and ‘0’ for the absence. All RAPD markers were performed
twice and only reproducible bands in the range of 3500 to 500 were scored. A
similarity matrix was generated using the equation s=2Nxy/(Nx+Ny), where Nxy
is the number of shared amplications between x and y entries. ‘Nx’ is the total
26
Int. J. Bioinformatics and Biological Sci.: v.2 n.1&2, p. 23-39. March & June 2014