Maitra and Roychowdhury
on flowering of anthurium, because after attaining a certain number of good sized
leaves, the plant enters into the reproductive phase (Dai and Paull, 1990). Though,
Nakasone and Kamemoto (1962) reported the ineffectiveness of Gibberellins on
Growth and flowering of Anthuriums at 10-100 ppm, others reported the alteration
in vegetative growth as affected by the application of various plant growth
regulators [Higaki and Rasmussen (1979), Imamura and Higaki (1988)] because
propensity of sucker production in anthurium has also great significance, as the
separation of sucker is one of the chief methods for commercial propagation. To
judge the effect of plant growth regulators on the growth, development, flowering
and propensity of sucker production of anthurium, the present experiment was
conducted.
materials and methods
Anthurium plants were grown in a semi-automated polyhouse having 50%
shadenet for consecutive two years at the Jaguli Horticulture farm of Bidhan
Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal, India. The protected structure was
made of 4-angled alluminium bars and UV stabilized polyethylene sheet was used
as cladding material. The temperature was controlled using evaporative cooling
system and humidity by placing wet gunny bags on the floor. Irrigation was given
with the help of rotary sprinkler nozzles. Chopped coconut husk was used as
growing medium. The plants were treated with varying levels of GA 3 and BA
both singly and in combination and the results were compared with control. The
required plant growth regulators were weighed according to the formulae- ppm
= mg/lit. The ingredients were made soluble with the help of specific solvents
e.g. 0.1 (N) HCl was the solvent for BA and rectified spirit was the solvent for
GA 3 by adding dropwise and the final volume was made up with distilled water.
Spraying was done twice in a year at a trimonthly interval (March and June of each
year). The experiment was laid out following RBD as the statistical design with 7
treatments replicated thrice. The data of both the individual years were collected
and pooled analysis of the results of both the individual years was considered for
evaluation through MSTATC software. The seven treatments with notations are
presented below:
t 0 – Control (no application of plant growth regulators)
t 1 = BA 500 ppm
t 2 = BA 1000 ppm
t 3 = GA 3 500 ppm
t 4 = GA 3 1000 ppm
t 5 = BA 250 ppm + GA 3 250 ppm
t 6 = BA 500 ppm + GA 3 500 ppm
42
Int. J. Bioinformatics and Biological Sci.: v.2 n.1&2, p. 41-53. March & June 2014