Best parameters for assessment
primary disease or its treatment. Direct costs include costs of physician visits,
diagnostic tests, prescription drugs, over-the-counter medication, hospital stay and
procedures, aid and devices and outpatient procedures.
Indirect cost: Indirect costs are more difficult to measure. Some can be given a
monetary value, although this is dependent on local systems of social support,
sickness benefits and pension. Lost of work productivity is important in chronic
musculoskeletal conditions but rarely is included in economic evaluations.
Intangible costs: Intangible costs are those associated with loss in function,
increased pain and reduced quality of life of patients, families and careers. These
include the costs of lost opportunities.These are very important for musculoskeletal
conditions, because disability is a significant outcome with limitation in activities
of daily living, reduction in leisure and community activities, chronic pain,
psychologic problems including depression and anxiety and reduced general
health.
cost-Effectiveness analysis : Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) involves
comparing programs or treatment alternatives with different safety and efficacy
profiles. Cost is measured in rupees and outcomes are often expressed in efficacy
unit,anaturalunit,ornon-rupeesunits(i.e.livessaved,casescured,lifeexpectancy,
or drop in blood pressure in mm Hg, improved functional ability, disease activity
etc) (Bootman, Larson, Mcghan, Townsend, 1989; Detsky, Nagiie, 1990). The
results of Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) are expressed as a ratio – either as
an average cost effectiveness ratio (ACER) or as an incremental cost effectiveness
ratio (ICER).
An Average CER represents the total cost of a program or treatment alternative
divided by its clinical outcome to yield a ratio representing the rupees cost per
specific clinical outcome gained, independent of comparators (Eisenberg, 1989;
Detsky, Nagiie, 1990; Sanchez, Lee, 1994). ACER = health care cost / Clinical
outcome.
An Incremental CEA may be used to determine the additional cost and the
effectiveness gained when one treatment alternative (A) is compared with the next
best treatment alternative (B).Thus, instead of comparing the average C/E ratio
of each treatment alternative, one over another treatment is compared with the
additional effect, benefit, or outcome it provides (Eisenberg, 1989).
ICER = cost A – cost B / effect A (%) – effect B (%).
clinical outcome
Clinical outcome are the medical events that occur as a result of disease or treatment
(e.g. safety and efficacy end points). The measures of clinical effectiveness in RA
are:
Int. J. Bioinformatics and Biological Sci.: v.2 n.1&2, p. 85-94. March & June 2014
87