Prajapati et al.
Twenty-Eight Joint counts: Twenty-eight joints are MCP (10), PIP (10), wrist
(2), elbow (2), shoulder (2) and knee (2) joints are examined for the presence
or absence of tenderness or pain on motion, swelling, or deformity (Smollen et
al., 1995).
Patient’s global assessment of disease activity: It represents patients overall
assessment of how the arthritis is doing. Patients are asked to mark a cross on a 0
to 10 cm scale (Visual analogue scale) for how well he/she is doing by considering
all the ways the arthritis affect the life.
Change of DAS score from Baseline is categorized as good improvement if DAS
change ≥ 1.2, moderate > 0.6 but ≤ 1.2, and no improvement ≤ 0.6 (Van Gestel et
al., 1998). The Disease Activity Score is widely used to quantify disease activity
and gauge the response to treatment. A rather complex calculation conceals the
relative contribution of each measure to the composite score.
(iii) Paulus : The Paulus response criteria is based on 20% improvement in 4
of 6 measures: Joint tenderness score, joint swelling scores, physician’s global
assessment, patient’s global assessment, ESR, and morning stiffness (Paulus et
al., 1990).
The current standards of disease activity indices for clinical trials are the EULAR
Disease Activity score (DAS) and the ACR 20% response criteria.
Disability
Disability in RA is associated with the extent of joint damage, and influenced
by factor such as age, female gender, low socio economic status, income and
educational level, and pain and depression (Fries, Spitz, Youg, 1982). The effects
of disability have a substantial impact on individuals and their role, and on their
families. Disability influences psychosocial function and can lead to anxiety,
depression and fatigue. Health assessment Questionnaire- Disability index (HAQ-
DI) (Chopra, 2004) and Global function performance (GPF) (Agustin, Roy,
Rincon, 2004) is expressed as measure of disability.
Health assessment Questionnaire (HaQ) : A new approach to assess disability
in RA was introduced by Fries et al., 1980, the Stanford Health Assessment
Questionnaire (HAQ).They developed a structure of patient outcome measurement
representing five separate dimensions: Death, Disability, Discomfort, Drug
(therapeutic) toxicity and Dollar cost. The Full HAQ assesses all the above
mentioned five dimensions of health outcome. The Short HAQ questionnaire
that only assesses disability (HAQ Disability Index, HAQ-DI) is often used by
itself, and is here referred to as HAQ. The HAQ-DI was originally developed
and validated for English speaking populations in the United States and Canada,
and has since been translated or culturally adapted into more than 60 different
90
Int. J. Bioinformatics and Biological Sci.: v.2 n.1&2, p. 85-94. March & June 2014