Development of a solid-state fermentation process for production of bacterial
Rameshkumar and Sivasudha (2011) also reported maximum yield of α- amylase
from rice bran at 80% moisture content by using Bacillus subtilis and obtained
decreased level of yield at further increase in moisture content. El-Shishtawy et
al. (2014) also reported the maximum α- amylase production from wheat bran
at moisture content of 80%. Nandakumar et al. (1996) obtained optimum α-
amylase production from wheat bran at 65% moisture content by using Bacillus
coagulans. Rai and Solanki (2014) reported highest amylase enzyme yield at 80%
while Tabassum et al. (2014) reported maximum production of α- amylase at
85% moisture content by using Bacillus licheniformis. Kalairasi and Parvatham
(2013) obtained the maximum enzyme production with moisture in the ratio of
1:2. Nagrajan et al. (2010) reported maximum amylase enzyme yield from wheat
bran at 88% moisture level by using Bacillus subtilis. Sameh et al. (2013) reported
maximum enzyme production from crude millet at 86% moisture content. Noreen
et al. (2002) reported highest α- amylase yield from banana peel at 84% moisture
content while Ashraf et al. (2005) obtained best results from wheat bran at the
moiture ratio 1:1 by using Bacillus licheniformis.
Effect of pH of SSF medium on alpha amylase production by Bacillus licheniformis
The initial pH of fermentation medium has a significant effect on bacterial growth
and enzyme production. The present study conducted the effect of pH on alpha
amylase enzyme production from wheat bran by Bacillus licheniformis. The
production medium was adjusted with different pH ranging from 4 to 10. From the
observation obtained in the present examination, maximum α-amylase production
(170.34 IU) was recorded at pH of 6.0. There was a 10.5% (152.46 IU) and 33.8%
(112.75 IU) decrease in activities at pH 7.0 and pH 8.0, respectively (Table 4 and
Fig 4).
Table 4. Production of alpha amylase by Bacillus licheniformis under different pH of SSF
medium
S.No
pH
Enzyme activity(IU)
1.
4
129.44
2.
5
142.85
3.
6
170.34
4.
7
152.46
5.
8
112.75
6.
9
81.14
7.
10
49.33
r =-0.767, tcal =-2.67 >ttab =2.57 at 5% (S), Y = 225.09 - 15.04 X
International Journal of Bioinformatics and Biological Sciences : v.2 n.3&4. Dec. 2014
211