<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "D:\kowsalya\Final Process\validation\JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">jar</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">jar</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">jar</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Journal of Animal Research</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub"/>
<issn pub-type="epub"/>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Association of Mastitis</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>India</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="other">jar-10-3-018</article-id>
<doi-group>
<journal-doi>10.30954/2277-940X.03.2020.18</journal-doi>
<article-doi><ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.30954/2277-940X.03.2020.18">10.30954/2277-940X.03.2020.18</ext-link></article-doi>
</doi-group>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject/>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Effect of Non-Genetic Factors on Test-Day Milk Yields and First Lactation Milk Yields in Holstein Friesian &#x00D7; Sahiwal Cattle</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Gupta</surname><given-names>Rohit</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff001"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Sahoo</surname><given-names>Saroj Kumar</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff002"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Kaur</surname><given-names>Simarjeet</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff002"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Dash</surname><given-names>Shakti Kant</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff002"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Malhotra</surname><given-names>Puneet</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff002"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Bansal</surname><given-names>Baljinder Kumar</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff002"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff001"><sup>1</sup><deptname>Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding</deptname>, <instname>Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University</instname>, <inststate>Ludhiana</inststate>, <country>INDIA</country></aff>
<aff id="aff002"><sup>2</sup><deptname>Directorate of Livestock Farms</deptname>, <instname>Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University</instname>, <inststate>Ludhiana</inststate>, <country>INDIA</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor001"><sup>*</sup>Corresponding author: SK Sahoo; E-mail: <email>saroj6804@gmail.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>6</month>
<year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>447</fpage>
<lpage>451</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-02-14">
<day>14</day>
<month>2</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
<date date-type="revised" iso-8601-date="2020-04-29">
<day>29</day>
<month>4</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2020-05-04">
<day>4</day>
<month>5</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; Association of Mastitis, India</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Association of Mastitis</copyright-holder>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="jar-10-3-018.pdf"></self-uri>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>The present study was carried out using first lactation monthly test-day milk yield records of 466 crossbred (HF &#x00D7; Sahiwal) cattle calved from 2000 to 2018 sired by 89 bulls maintained at Directorate of Livestock Farms, GADVASU, Ludhiana. Mixed model analysis was carried out by least-squares maximum likelihood programme to study the effects of non-genetic factors on first full lactation milk yield (FFLMY), first lactation 305-day milk yield (FL305MY) and monthly test-day (TD) milk yield records of crossbred cattle. The least squares means of different monthly TD milk yields (1<sup>st</sup> to 11<sup>th</sup>) were 12.05 &#x00B1; 0.42, 15.65 &#x00B1; 0.42, 15.38 &#x00B1; 0.44, 14.44 &#x00B1; 0.43, 13.79 &#x00B1; 0.41, 12.88 &#x00B1; 0.40, 12.27 &#x00B1; 0.42, 11.83 &#x00B1; 0.37, 10.85 &#x00B1; 0.42, 10.64 &#x00B1; 0.45 and 10.28 &#x00B1; 0.50 kg, respectively. For FFLMY and FL305MY the means were 4979.60&#x00B1;184.45 and 3818.17&#x00B1;103.26 kg. The effects of different AFC groups were non-significant on TDs and FL305MYs, whereas it was significant (p&#x003C;0.01) for FFLMY. The season was significant (p&#x003C;0.01) for all the monthly TDs whereas it was non-significant for FFLMY and FL305MY. The sire was significant (p&#x003C;0.01) for most of the TDs and FL305MYs except the later TDs (9<sup>th</sup>, 10<sup>th</sup> and 11<sup>th</sup> TD) and FFLMYs. The present investigation revealed the importance of non-genetic factors in performance evaluation of crossbred cattle based on monthly test-day milk yield, FL305MY and FFLMY records.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<title>Keywords</title>
<kwd>Crossbred cattle</kwd>
<kwd>test day milk yield</kwd>
<kwd>non-genetic factors</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="0"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<ref-count count="13"/>
<page-count count="6"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<p>Milk production is one of the most important economic traits in dairy cattle. Improving milk productivity of Indian cow has been pursued since many decades in India. It is conceded that average yield of an Indian cow is very low, at about 1000 litre/lactation (Dohare <italic>et al</italic>., 2014). Cross breeding with exotic European breeds are the best alternative to improve the genotype and milk producing capability of the low yielding Indian cows.</p>
<p>With only 17.67 percent of total bovine population, crossbred cattle contributes 26 per cent of the total milk production in India (BAHS, 2019). During 2018-19, the average milk yield per exotic/crossbred cattle in Punjab (13.43 kg/day) was far above the national average (7.95 kg/day) which describes the importance of crossbred cattle in India and Punjab, in particular.</p>
<p>The main objective of any breed improvement program is to bring about genetic progress by selection of superior sires and dams. The sires are genetically evaluated on the basis of first lactation 305-day milk yield of their daughters at organized farms. The test-day milk yield model accounts for environmental variation specific to individual test-day milk yields and genetic effects associated with individual animals. The estimation of effects of non-genetic parameters on test-day and full lactation milk yields are helpful in predicting selection responses and can be used for further refinement of breeding programmes for overall improvement and genetic gains in organized farms. Accordingly, the present study was done to see the effect of non-genetic factors on first lactation milk yields of crossbred cattle (HF &#x00D7; Sahiwal) maintained at Directorate of Livestock Farms, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (GADVASU), Ludhiana.</p>
<p><bold>How to cite this article:</bold> Gupta, R., Sahoo, S.K., Kaur, S., Dash, S.K., Malhotra, P. and Bansal, B.K. (2020). Effect of non-genetic factors on test-day milk yields and first lactation milk yields in Holstein Friesian &#x00D7; Sahiwal cattle. <italic>J. Anim. Res.</italic>, <bold>10</bold>(3): 447-451.</p>
<p><bold>Source of Support:</bold> None; <bold>Conflict of Interest:</bold> None</p>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<p>The study was conducted on first lactation monthly test- day milk yield records (4415 Nos.) of 466 crossbred (CB) cattle sired by 89 bulls maintained during 2000 - 2018 (19 years) at Directorate of Livestock Farms, GADVASU, Ludhiana. The crossbred cattle with minimum lactation length of 100 days were considered for the study.</p>
<sec id="s1-1">
<title>Classification of data</title>
<p>The data were classified and coded according to different season of calving and age at first calving groups for first full lactation milk yield (FFLMY), first lactation 305-day milk yield (FL305MY) and monthly test-day (TD) milk yield records of crossbred cattle.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s1-2">
<title>Season of calving</title>
<p>Season was considered to be one of the main factors of the environment that affects the performance of cattle. There is a wide variation of climatic conditions throughout the year, differences are being more between the seasons and less within a season. Thus, the year was divided into four seasons on the basis of rainfall, temperature and humidity over the years as S-1 (Winter: November to February), S-2 (Summer: March to May), S-3 (Rainy: June-August) and S-4 (Autumn: September-October).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s1-3">
<title>Age at first calving (AFC)</title>
<p>The data were classified into three different groups according to the age at first calving. AFC within a range of mean &#x00B1; 1 SD was considered group-2 (A-2), &#x003E;1 SD group-3 (A-3) and &#x003C;1 SD as group-1 (A-1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s1-4">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>For statistical analysis, SPSS software programme (SPSS, 2013) version 22.0 was used. Mixed model analysis was carried out to study the effects of non-genetic factors on FFLMY, FL305MY and different monthly test day (TD) milk yield (6<sup>th</sup>, 36<sup>th</sup>,	306<sup>th</sup>) records of first lactation crossbred cattle data. The following models were used:</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block"><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Y</mml:mtext><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">ijkl</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">&#x00A0;=&#x00A0;m&#x00A0;+&#x00A0;A</mml:mtext><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">&#x00A0;+&#x00A0;B</mml:mtext><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">j</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">&#x00A0;+&#x00A0;C</mml:mtext><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">k</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">&#x00A0;+&#x00A0;e</mml:mtext><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">ijkl</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where,</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><italic>Y<sub>ijkl</sub></italic> &#x003D; FFLMY/ FL305MY/ TD milk yields of the <italic>i</italic><sup>th</sup> individual of <italic>k</italic><sup>th</sup> sire in <italic>i</italic><sup>th</sup> age group and <italic>j</italic><sup>th</sup> season</p>
<p><italic>m</italic> &#x003D; Population mean</p>
<p><italic>A<sub>i</sub></italic> &#x003D; Fixed effect of <italic>i</italic><sup>th</sup> age at first calving (<italic>i</italic> &#x003D; 1 to 3)</p>
<p><italic>B<sub>j</sub></italic> &#x003D; Fixed effect of <italic>j</italic><sup>th</sup> season of calving (<italic>j</italic> &#x003D; 1 to 4)</p>
<p><italic>C<sub>k</sub></italic> &#x003D; Random effect of <italic>k</italic><sup>th</sup> sire (<italic>k</italic> &#x003D; 1 to 89)</p>
<p><italic>e<sub>ijk</sub></italic> &#x003D; Random error, assumed to be normally and independently distributed with mean zero and constant variance <italic>i.e.</italic> NID (0, &#x03C3;<sup>2</sup><italic>e</italic>)</p>
</disp-quote>
<p>The statistical significance of various fixed effects was determined by &#x2018;F&#x2019; test. For significant effects, the differences between pairs of levels of effects were tested by Tukey&#x2019;s HSD (Honest Significant Difference) test.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>Results and Discussion</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>Averages of different first lactation milk yield traits</title>
<p>The least squares means along with their standard errors (S.E.) for first lactation monthly test day milk yields (TD) have been presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>. Perusal of the table showed that the highest weekly test day milk yield was observed in TD-2 (15.65 kg) and the lowest was observed in TD- 11 (10.28 kg). In general, the monthly test day milk yield increased till TD-2 and thereafter a gradual decline was noticed till the end of lactation. Similar findings were also reported by Dongre <italic>et al</italic>. (2013) and they found highest milk yield in fortnightly TD-3 (36<sup>th</sup> day) in Sahiwal cattle (8.58 kg). Thorat and Thombre (2019) also reported peak yield around 6<sup>th</sup> week (43<sup>rd</sup> day) of lactation in Holstein Friesian &#x00D7; Deoni crossbred (Holdeo) cattle (7.52 kg).</p>
<p>The average FL305MY in the present study was 3818.17&#x00B1;103.26 kg (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>). Singh and Gurnani (2004) reported average FL305MY as 3,173&#x00B1;82 kg and 2616&#x00B1;82 kg, respectively in Karan-Fries and Karan-Swiss crossbred cattle. Dongre <italic>et al</italic>. (2013) reported average FL305MY as 2005.28&#x00B1;36.17 kg in Sahiwal cattle. The average FFLMY in the present study was 4979.60&#x00B1;184.45 kg (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>). Singh <italic>et al.</italic> (2006) reported average FFLMY as 3064.74&#x00B1;49.40 kg in HF &#x00D7; Sahiwal crossbred cattle whereas Mandal <italic>et al.</italic> (2013) reported the average FFLMY as 2881.35&#x00B1;124.34 kg in crossbred Jersey cattle. The higher yield in the present study could be due to higher inheritance of Holstein Friesian blood in the herd.</p>
<table id="tab1">
<label>Table 1:</label><caption><p>Least squares analysis of variance (mean squares only) for individual monthly test day milk yields, first lactation 305day (FL305DMY) and first full lactation (FFLDMY) milk yields in crossbred cattle</p></caption>
<tgroup cols="4">
<colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
<colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
<colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
<colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><p>Traits</p></th>
<th><p>AFC groups</p></th>
<th><p>Season</p></th>
<th><p>Sire</p></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><p>d.f.</p></td>
<td><p>2</p></td>
<td><p>3</p></td>
<td><p>88</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>TD1</p></td>
<td><p>37.867</p></td>
<td><p>197.284 <sup>*</sup></p></td>
<td><p>28.734<sup>*</sup></p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>TD2</p></td>
<td><p>50.037</p></td>
<td><p>320.783<sup>*</sup></p></td>
<td><p>33.158<sup>*</sup></p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>TD3</p></td>
<td><p>6.401</p></td>
<td><p>279.972<sup>*</sup></p></td>
<td><p>27.816<sup>*</sup></p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>TD4</p></td>
<td><p>18.418</p></td>
<td><p>363.429<sup>*</sup></p></td>
<td><p>32.807<sup>*</sup></p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>TD5</p></td>
<td><p>19.307</p></td>
<td><p>326.053<sup>*</sup></p></td>
<td><p>32.988<sup>*</sup></p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>TD6</p></td>
<td><p>4.767</p></td>
<td><p>168.586<sup>*</sup></p></td>
<td><p>28.523<sup>*</sup></p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>TD7</p></td>
<td><p>2.701</p></td>
<td><p>80.963<sup>*</sup></p></td>
<td><p>22.797<sup>**</sup></p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>TD8</p></td>
<td><p>11.717</p></td>
<td><p>66.992<sup>*</sup></p></td>
<td><p>17.697<sup>**</sup></p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>TD9</p></td>
<td><p>6.242</p></td>
<td><p>74.801<sup>*</sup></p></td>
<td><p>17.626</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>TD10</p></td>
<td><p>14.079</p></td>
<td><p>73.690<sup>*</sup></p></td>
<td><p>18.324</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>TD11</p></td>
<td><p>17.144</p></td>
<td><p>69.061<sup>*</sup></p></td>
<td><p>16.802</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>FL305DMY</p></td>
<td><p>816310.599</p></td>
<td><p>1624287.009</p></td>
<td><p>1607818.903<sup>**</sup></p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>FFLDMY</p></td>
<td><p>17058089.652<sup>*</sup></p></td>
<td><p>966064.014</p></td>
<td><p>4291118.505</p></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</tgroup>
</table>
<p>*significant at 1&#x0025; (p&#x2264;0.01); **significant at 5&#x0025; (p&#x2264;0.05).</p>
<table id="tab2">
<label>Table 2:</label><caption><p>Least squares means (kg) of first lactation 305-day (FL305DMY) and first full lactation (FFLDMY) milk yields in crossbred cattle</p></caption>
<tgroup cols="4">
<colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
<colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
<colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
<colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><p></p></th>
<th><p>No of observations</p></th>
<th><p>FL305DMY Mean &#x00B1; SE (kg)</p></th>
<th><p>FFLDMY Mean &#x00B1; SE (kg)</p></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><p><bold>Overall</bold></p></td>
<td><p>466</p></td>
<td><p>3818.17&#x00B1;103.26</p></td>
<td><p>4979.60&#x00B1;184.45</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>S-1</p></td>
<td><p>173</p></td>
<td><p>3924.67<sup>ab</sup>&#x00B1;125.32</p></td>
<td><p>5021.80&#x00B1;223.86</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>S-2</p></td>
<td><p>123</p></td>
<td><p>3691.04<sup>ab</sup>&#x00B1;136.25</p></td>
<td><p>5063.72&#x00B1;243.37</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>S-3</p></td>
<td><p>108</p></td>
<td><p>3704.96<sup>a</sup>&#x00B1;139.65</p></td>
<td><p>4825.07&#x00B1;249.46</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>S-4</p></td>
<td><p>62</p></td>
<td><p>3952.00<sup>b</sup>&#x00B1;185.11</p></td>
<td><p>5007.81&#x00B1;330.64</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>A-1</p></td>
<td><p>50</p></td>
<td><p>3726.33&#x00B1;185.19</p></td>
<td><p>5341.26<sup>b</sup>&#x00B1;330.80</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>A-2</p></td>
<td><p>360</p></td>
<td><p>3753.63&#x00B1; 100.52</p></td>
<td><p>4490.94<sup>a</sup>&#x00B1; 179.55</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>A-3</p></td>
<td><p>56</p></td>
<td><p>3974.54&#x00B1;174.93</p></td>
<td><p>5106.59<sup>ab</sup>&#x00B1;312.46</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>Means</p></td>
<td><p>with different</p></td>
<td><p>superscripts within</p></td>
<td><p>a column differ</p></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</tgroup>
</table>
<p>Means with different superscripts within a column differ significantly.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>Non-genetic factors affecting different first lactation milk yield traits</title>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>Season of calving</title>
<p>The effect of season of calving was highly significant (P&#x003C;0.01) on all the monthly test-day milk yields (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>). The result was in almost conformity with results obtained by Dongre <italic>et al</italic>. (2011) in Sahiwal cattle and Thorat and Thombre (2019) in Holdeo cattle. The least square means along with their standard errors for season of calving affecting monthly test day milk yields are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>.</p>
<p>Overall, non-significant effect of season of calving was observed for FFLMY and FL305MY. However, there was significant difference between rainy and autumn calvers. Manoj <italic>et al.</italic> (2012) also reported non-significant effect of season of calving on FL305MY in Sahiwal cattle. However, Ratwan <italic>et al.</italic> (2016) reported significant effect of season on FL305MY in Jersey crossbred cattle. Jadhav and Khan (1995) in Holstein Friesian &#x00D7; Sahiwal cows and Varaprasad <italic>et al</italic>. (2013) in Jersey &#x00D7; Sahiwal cows reported non-significant effect of season on FLMY.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>Age at first calving</title>
<p>The effects of different groups of age at first calving on monthly test day milk yields was non- significant. However, Dongre <italic>et al.</italic> (2011) reported significant (P&#x003C;0.05) effect of AFC groups on weekly TD4, TD5, TD7, TD8, TD9, TD11, TD12, TD14, TD16, TD19, TD21, TD23 and TD36 and non-significant effect was observed on remaining test days milk yields. Thorat and Thombre (2019) reported significant (P &#x003C; 0.01) variation due to age at first calving groups and non-significant in rest of the weekly test day milk yields in Holdeo cattle.</p>
<p>For FFLMYs, the effect of AFC was significant (P &#x003C; 0.01); whereas it was non-significant for FL305MY in the present study. Wondifraw <italic>et al</italic>. (2013) and Mandal <italic>et al</italic>. (2013) also reported non-significant effect of AFC on 305 days milk yield in HF &#x00D7; Deoni cattle and Jersey crossbred cattle, respectively. Mandal <italic>et al</italic>. (2013) also reported non-significant effect of age group on first lactation total milk yield in crossbred cattle.</p>
<table id="tab3">
<label>Table 3:</label><caption><p>Least squares means (kg) of different test-day milk yields in crossbred cattle</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="figr_pg04.jpg"/>
</table>
<p>Means with different superscripts within a column differ significantly.</p>
<p>Means with different superscripts within a row differ significantly.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>Sire effect</title>
<p>Highly Significant (p&#x003C;0.01) effect of sire was observed for early TDs (TD-1 to TD-6), significant (p&#x003C;0.05) effect for the mid lactation TDs (TD-7 &#x0026; TD-8) and non-significant for rest of the test days. The sire effect was significant (p&#x003C;0.05) for FL305MY whereas it was non-significant for FFLMY. Singh and Gurnani (2004) reported a significant (P&#x003C;0.01) effect of sire on FL305MY in Karan Fries and Karan Swiss cattle. In Jersey crossbred, Ratwan <italic>et al</italic>. (2016) reported that sire had significant influence on FL305MY. In contrary to present study, Ratwan <italic>et al</italic>. (2016) reported significant influence of sire on total lactation milk yield (TLMY).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The monthly test-day milk yields were significantly influenced by season of calving. Significant influence of environmental components on milk production traits elucidates the importance of non-genetic parameters in breeding programmes for genetic improvement of crossbred cattle through selection. The effect of sire was significant for most of test-day milk yields suggesting the use of superior sires for improvement of milk production traits in dairy cattle.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="bib001"><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><collab>BAHS</collab>. <year>2019</year>. <article-title>Basic Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Statistics. Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying &#x0026; Fisheries. Ministry of Agriculture</article-title>, <publisher-loc>Govt. of India.</publisher-loc></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="bib002"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Dohare</surname>, <given-names>A.K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Singh</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Verma</surname>, <given-names>M.R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Perme</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Sharma</surname>, <given-names>V.B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Gupta</surname>, <given-names>N.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name><surname>Kshandakar</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2014</year>. <article-title>Comparison of standard lactation curve models using fortnightly milk records in Frieswal cattle.</article-title> <source>Vet. World</source>, <volume>7</volume>(<issue>10</issue>): <fpage>831</fpage>-<lpage>834</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="bib003"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Dongre</surname>, <given-names>V.B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Gandhi</surname>, <given-names>R.S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Singh</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Raja</surname>, <given-names>T.V.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name><surname>Singh</surname>, <given-names>R.K.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2011</year>. <article-title>Effect of non-genetic factors on weekly test day milk yields and first lactation traits in Sahiwal cattle.</article-title> <source>Indian J. Anim. Res</source>., <volume>45</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>139</fpage>-<lpage>142</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="bib004"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Dongre</surname>, <given-names>V.B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Gandhi</surname>, <given-names>R.S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Singh</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Sachdeva</surname>, <given-names>G.K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Singh</surname>, <given-names>R.K.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name><surname>Gupta</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2013</year>. <article-title>Influence of non-genetic factors on fortnightly test day milk yields and first lactation 305 day milk yield in Sahiwal cattle.</article-title> <source>Indian J. Anim. Res</source>., <volume>47</volume>(<issue>2</issue>): <fpage>181</fpage>-<lpage>183</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="bib005"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Jadhav</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name><surname>Khan</surname>, <given-names>F.H.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>1995</year>. <article-title>Genetic and non-genetic factors affecting first lactation yield in Holstein &#x00D7; Sahiwal crossbreds.</article-title> <source>Indian J. Dairy Sci</source>., <volume>48</volume>: <fpage>251</fpage>-<lpage>252</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="bib006"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Mandal</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Roy</surname>, <given-names>P.K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ghosh</surname>, <given-names>M.K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Chatterjee</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name><surname>Das</surname>, <given-names>S.K.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2013</year>. <article-title>Genetic and environmental effects on first lactation traits of Jersey crossbred cattle in an organized herd of eastern India.</article-title> <source>Indian J. Dairy Sci</source>., <volume>66</volume>(<issue>2</issue>): <fpage>130</fpage>-<lpage>133</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="bib007"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Manoj</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Gandhi</surname>, <given-names>R.S</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Raja</surname>, <given-names>T.V.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Singh</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name><surname>Sachdeva</surname>, <given-names>G.K.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2012</year>. <article-title>Effect of non-genetic factors on first lactation production and reproduction performance in Sahiwal cattle.</article-title> <source>Indian J. Dairy Sci</source>., <volume>65</volume>(<issue>3</issue>): <fpage>264</fpage>-<lpage>265</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="bib008"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ratwan</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Mandal</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Kumar</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Kumar</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name><surname>Chakravarty</surname> <given-names>A.K.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Genetic analysis of lactation traits in Jersey crossbred cattle.</article-title> <source>Indian J. Dairy Sci</source>., <volume>69</volume>(<issue>2</issue>): <fpage>1</fpage>-<lpage>4</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="bib009"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Singh</surname>, <given-names>M.K.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name><surname>Gurnani</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2004</year>. <article-title>Performance evaluation of Karan Fries and Karan Swiss cattle under closed breeding system.</article-title> <source>Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci</source>., <volume>17</volume>(<issue>1</issue>): <fpage>1</fpage>-<lpage>6</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="bib010"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Singh</surname>, <given-names>N.P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Yadav</surname>, <given-names>M.C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Kushwaha</surname>, <given-names>B.P.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <etal>et al.</etal>. <year>2006</year>. <article-title>Factors affecting milk production efficiency traits in Holstein &#x00D7; Sahiwal crosses.</article-title> <source>Indian J. Dairy Sci</source>., <volume>59</volume>(<issue>3</issue>): <fpage>172</fpage>-<lpage>176</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="bib011"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Thorat</surname>, <given-names>B.N.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name><surname>Thombre</surname>, <given-names>B.M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2019</year>. <article-title>Effect of non-genetic factors on weekly test day milk yield records in Holdeo cattle of Marathwada region.</article-title> <source>Indian J. Anim. Res</source>., <volume>53</volume>(<issue>6</issue>): <fpage>837</fpage>-<lpage>842</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="bib012"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Varaprasad</surname>, <given-names>A.R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Raghunandan</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Kumar</surname>, <given-names>M.K.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name><surname>Prakash</surname>, <given-names>M.G.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2013</year>. <article-title>Studies on the productive performance of Jersey &#x00D7; Sahiwal cows in Chittoor district of Andhra Pradesh.</article-title> <source>African J. Agric. Res</source>., <volume>8</volume>(<issue>14</issue>): <fpage>1200</fpage>-<lpage>1203</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="bib013"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Wondifraw</surname>, <given-names>Z.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Thombre</surname>, <given-names>B.M.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name><surname>Bainwad</surname>, <given-names>D.V.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2013</year>. <article-title>Effect of non-genetic factors on milk production of Holstein Friesian &#x00D7; Deoni crossbred cows.</article-title> <source>Int. J. Livest. Prod</source>., <volume>4</volume>(<issue>7</issue>): <fpage>106</fpage>-<lpage>112</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
