<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">JAR</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">JAR</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAR</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Journal of Animal Research</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">2249-6629</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2277-940X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Association of Mastitis</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>India</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="other">JAR-11-01-0173</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30954/2277-940X.01.2021.23</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Research Paper</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Impact of Bio-preservatives on Sensory Quality of Milk Solids Incorporated <italic>Khoa</italic> Stored at Room Temperature (23&#x00B1;2&#x00B0;C)</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Vaquil</surname></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Bhardwaj</surname><given-names>P.K.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>Surender</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor001">*</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Yadav</surname><given-names>Sanjay</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
</contrib></contrib-group>
<aff id="A1">Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary &#x0026; Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, INDIA</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor001"><label>*</label>Corresponding author: S Kumar; E-mail: <email>hoodas246@gmail.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>02</month>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>11</volume>
<issue>01</issue>
<fpage>173</fpage>
<lpage>180</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-12-26">
<day>26</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
<date date-type="revised" iso-8601-date="2021-01-23">
<day>23</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2021-01-27">
<day>27</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; Association of Mastitis, India</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Association of Mastitis, India</copyright-holder>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="JAR-11-01-0173.pdf"></self-uri>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>The study was conducted to find the effectiveness of bio-preservatives and packaging method on the shelf life of milk solids based <italic>khoa. Khoa</italic> samples were prepared individually by combinations of SMP (skimmed milk powder) with <italic>ghee</italic> and whey protein concentrates and SMP with cream (50% fat). The control sample was prepared utilizing full cream buffalo milk (6% fat). Natamycin at 10 ppm and nisin at 100 IU/g were incorporated while <italic>khoa</italic> was still hot (85-90&#x00B0;C). The samples without biopreservatives were packaged in simple and vacuum packaging separately. The all treatments were evaluated for sensory quality during storage at room temperature (23&#x00B1;2 &#x00B0;C). The study revealed that vacuum packaged and bio-preservatives treated samples were organoleptically acceptable up to 20<sup>th</sup> day storage.</p>
<sec>
<title>HIGHLIGHTS</title>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p><italic>Khoa</italic> can be very well prepared using milk solids.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Bio-preservatives and vacuum packaging increase the shelf life of <italic>khoa</italic>.</p></list-item>
</list>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd><italic>Khoa</italic></kwd>
<kwd>milk solids</kwd>
<kwd>bioreservatives</kwd>
<kwd>room temperature</kwd>
<kwd>storage</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="0"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<ref-count count="23"/>
<page-count count="8"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1">
<title/>
<p>India has made significant progress in milk production and has emerged as the highest milk producing country in the world. India&#x2019;s annual milk production during 201617 was 165.4 million tonnes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R3">DAHDF, Annual Report 2018</xref>, India). Approx. 50% of the total milk produced is converted to various traditional dairy products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R16">Prasad <italic>et al</italic>., 2012</xref>). Conversion of liquid milk into traditional dairy products increases the longevity of milk solids. Traditional milk products which are converted from milk in order to preserve the milk solids in a concentrated form for extended period play a significant role in the economic, social, religious and nutritional values of the Indian masses from the time immemorial. As per Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R6">FSSAI, 2011</xref>) <italic>khoa</italic> by whatever variety of names it is sold such as <italic>pindi, danedar, dhap, mawa</italic> or <italic>kava</italic> means the product obtained from cow or buffalo or goat or sheep milk or milk solids or a combination thereof by rapid drying. About six lakh tonnes of <italic>khoa</italic> is being manufactured annually, mostly in private and unorganized sectors of India by utilizing about 7% of the total milk produced (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R12">Kumar, 2013</xref>). <italic>Khoa</italic> is a major intermediate base for a variety of sweets like <italic>burfi, peda, kalakand, gulabjamun</italic> etc. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R21">Soumya <italic>et al</italic>., 2015</xref>). The regional and seasonal imbalances in milk production in India call for developing suitable technology for efficient use of surplus milk solids.</p>
<p>Food spoilage refers to the damage of the original nutritional value, texture and flavor of the food that eventually render food harmful to people and unsuitable to eat. Milk based sweets during storage undergo several physical, biochemical and microbiological changes making them unfit for human consumption (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R13">Londhe <italic>et al</italic>., 2012</xref>). Microbes may gain entry into food at any stage of processing right from the farm to till the food is reached to the final consumer like at the time of packaging, transport and storage etc, so it becomes imperative not only to take all kinds of preventive measures but also to evaluate at every stage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R2">Agarwal and Rachappa, 2006</xref>).</p>
<p><bold>How to cite this article:</bold> Vaquil, Bhardwaj, P.K., Kumar, S. and Yadav, S. (2021). Impact of bio-preservatives on sensory quality of milk solids incorporated <italic>khoa</italic> stored at room temperature (23&#x00B1;2&#x00B0;C). <italic>J. Anim. Res.,</italic> <bold>11</bold>(1): 173-180. <bold>Source of Support:</bold> None; <bold>Conflict of Interest:</bold> None The deteriorating agents of the food quality are oxygen contained in the air and microorganisms such as bacteria and moulds. Oxygen promotes several types of deteriorative reactions in foods including oxidation of fat, browning and pigment oxidation and is the key element required for the growth of common spoilage bacteria and fungi. Therefore, to increase the shelf life of foods, the package atmosphere should contain a low concentration of residual oxygen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R18">Sandhya, 2010</xref>). In order to achieve improved food safety against pathogens, food industry makes use of chemical preservatives. But, these chemicals have many drawbacks, which include their proven toxicity, alteration of the organoleptic and nutritional properties of foods and recent consumer demands for safe and minimally processed products without additives. Thus, to harmonize consumer demands with the necessary safety standards, traditional means of controlling microbial spoilage and safety hazards in foods are being replaced by combinations of innovative technologies that include biological antimicrobial systems such as lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and/or their metabolites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R14">Nath <italic>et al</italic>., 2013</xref>). In addition, the absence of proper packaging, the rate of chemical deterioration of <italic>khoa</italic> such as oxidation and browning increase. But, use of antioxidant, antimicrobial agent and packaging increase the shelf- life of <italic>Khoa</italic>.</p>
<p>The concentration of natamycin for yoghurt preservation has been suggested to be in the range of 5-10 ppm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R22">Thomas and Delves, 2001</xref>). The use of natamycin as a natural preservative in dairy products and other foods has been approved in over sixty countries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R5">Delves <italic>et al</italic>., 2005</xref>). The use of nisin as bio-preservative has been widely investigated in a large variety of fresh and processed foods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R10">Jung <italic>et al</italic>., 1992</xref>). It is effective against several pathogenic Gram-positive bacteria such as <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> and <italic>C. botulinum,</italic> but also against some Gram-negative pathogens such as <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> and <italic>Salmonella spp</italic>. Keeping above points in view, this study was carried to develop bio-preservative incorporated milk solid based <italic>khoa</italic> and subjected to vacuum packaging as well and study their effect on organoleptic quality during storage at 23&#x00B1;2 &#x00B0;C.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title>
<sec>
<title>Place of Study</title>
<p>The present study was conducted in the Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Sciences, LUVAS, Hisar to develop <italic>khoa</italic> by utilizing milk solids and subsequent impact of packaging methods and bio-preservatives to enhance the shelf-life at room temperature (23&#x00B1;2 &#x00B0;C).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Procurement of raw materials</title>
<p>Ghee, cream (50% fat) and full cream buffalo milk (6% fat) were procured from experimental dairy plant, Department of LPT, LUVAS, Hisar. Skim milk powder (SMP), whey protein concentrates and low density polyethylene (LDPE) pouches were procured from local market.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Bio-preservative</title>
<p>Nisin was procured from Hi Media Laboratories and Natamycin from Sigma-Aldrich.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Preparation of khoa using milk solids</title>
<p><italic>Khoa</italic> was standardized for fat by Pearson&#x2019;s square method as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R4">De (2004)</xref> to meet legal standard of fat (20% fat on fresh basis and 30% fat on dry basis). <italic>Khoa</italic> samples were prepared separately by combinations of SMP with <italic>ghee</italic> and whey protein concentrates and SMP with cream (50% fat).</p>
<p>For <italic>ghee</italic> based <italic>khoa</italic>; 680 g SMP (13.6%), 300 g <italic>ghee</italic> (6%) and 20 g (0.4%) pre-standardized whey protein concentrates were mixed and hot water (80%) was added to make total weight 5 kg. Similarly, for cream based <italic>khoa</italic>; 500g SMP (10%) + 480 g cream (9.6%) were mixed and hot water (80.4%) added to make total weight 5 kg. Proper mixing and filtration was done followed by preheating at 65&#x00B0;C. Then homogenization (double stage) and desiccation was carried out in gas operated semiautomatic machine. The control <italic>khoa</italic> sample was prepared utilizing full cream buffalo milk (6% fat).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Addition of bio-preservatives</title>
<p>Natamycin at 10 ppm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R17">Rabee and Heba, 2017</xref>) and nisin at 100 IU/g (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R8">Gupta <italic>et al</italic>., 1989</xref>) were added while <italic>khoa</italic> was still hot (about 85-90 &#x00B0;C). Proper mixing was done in machine.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Packaging</title>
<p>Bio preservatives added <italic>khoa</italic> samples were simply packaged in LDPE bag and sealed with sealing machine. The samples without bio-preservative were packaged in two different packaging techniques i.e. simple packaging and vacuum packaging.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Sensory quality evaluation</title>
<p>Analysis of sensory quality of developed <italic>khoa</italic> samples was performed by using the nine point hedonic scale (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R15">Nelson and Trout, 1964</xref>) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). A semi trained panel evaluated the sensory attributes viz. color and appearance, flavor, and overall acceptability at regular interval of 5 days at room temperature (23&#x00B1;2 <bold>&#x00B0;</bold> C).</p>
<table-wrap id="t1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Scores under 9 point hedonic scale</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JAR-11-01-0173-f001.jpg"/>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Data was analyzed statistically on &#x2018;SPSS-16.0&#x2019; (SPSS Inc., Chicago, II USA) software package as per standard methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R20">Snedecor and Cochran, 1994</xref>). The statistical significance was estimated at 5% level (P&#x2264;0.05) and evaluated with Duncan&#x2019;s Multiple Range Test.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title>
<sec>
<title>Color and appearance</title>
<p>Color and appearance score of <italic>khoa</italic> stored at room temperature ranged from 8.25 to 8.50 (<italic>i.e.</italic> all treatments liked very much) on 0<sup>th</sup> day, however all values were found statistically similar to each other (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). On every interval of storage there was continuous decrease in the color and appearance scores of all samples.</p>
<p>On 5<sup>th</sup> day the highest value of color and appearance score was reported in C<sub>2</sub> (8.00) and lowest value in T<sub>5</sub> (7.67). On 10<sup>th</sup> day of storage color and appearance scores ranged 6.92 to 7.33. There was no significant difference in color and appearance scores of all treatments on particular day till 15<sup>th</sup> day of storage. But on 20<sup>th</sup> day, T<sub>5</sub> had score 6.00 which was found significantly (P&#x2264;0.05) lower than that of C2 (6.75), C3 (6.83), C4 (6.75), T3 (6.67) and T4 (6.58). However the all treatments were slightly liked till the 20<sup>th</sup> day of storage at room temperature. Sensory evaluation was not performed on 25<sup>th</sup> day due to visible spoilage of sample.</p>
<p>There was significant decrease in color and appearance scores of <italic>khoa</italic> with advancement of storage period. This might be due to microbial growth (yeast and moulds), known to be responsible for discoloration and lipolytic defects in <italic>khoa</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R7">Goyal and Srinivasan, 1984</xref>). Microbial contamination produces undesirable effects e.g. change in color, odour, taste and texture of the products. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R9">Jain <italic>et al</italic>. (2015)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R1">Acharya and Agrawal (2010)</xref> also reported decrease in sensory score of <italic>kalakand</italic> and <italic>khoa</italic>, respectively during storage at 25&#x00B0;C. Although, every treatment had sensory score more than 6 (<italic>i.e</italic>. slightly liked) till 20<sup>th</sup> day of storage. All natamycin treated <italic>khoa</italic> samples had higher color and appearance scores which might be due to lower yeast and mould counts by caused by bio-preservatives.</p>
<p>The <italic>khoa</italic> samples which were packaged under vacuum condition had better color and appearance score than simple packaged sample. This might be because of the reason that vacuum packaging did not allow atmospheric factors to distort the color and appearance of <italic>khoa</italic>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R11">Kumar <italic>et al</italic>. (2010)</xref> also noticed the higher color and appearance score in vacuum packaged <italic>khoa</italic> than simple packaged <italic>khoa. Khoa</italic> samples prepared by using milk solids had slightly lower color and appearance score as compare to buffalo milk based <italic>khoa</italic>. Voghra and Rajoria (1983) also reported lower color score for <italic>khoa</italic> prepared from milk powder than buffalo milk <italic>khoa</italic>.</p>
<table-wrap id="t2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Color and appearance scores of <italic>khoa</italic> at room temperature (23&#x00B1;2&#x00B0;C) (Mean&#x00B1;S.E., n=12)</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JAR-11-01-0173-f002.jpg"/>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Body and texture</title>
<p>Sensory panelist awarded body and texture scores more than 8 (i.e. liked very much) to all treatments on 0<sup>th</sup> day of storage (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). There was no significant difference in body and texture scores on that day. Body and texture scores of all treatment ranged 7.75 to 8.05 on 5<sup>th</sup> day of storage. On 10<sup>th</sup> day C<sub>3</sub> (7.67) had highest value while T<sub>5</sub> (7.25) had lowest body and texture scores, this showed moderate acceptance of all samples on that day.</p>
<p>Till 15<sup>th</sup> day, body and texture scores of all treatment were found statistically similar to each other on every particular day of storage. But on 20<sup>th</sup> day of storage, body and texture score of T<sub>5</sub> (6.08) was observed significantly (P&#x2264;0.05) lower than C<sub>2</sub> (6.75), C<sub>3</sub> (6.83), C<sub>4</sub> (6.75) and T<sub>3</sub> (6.75). All stored sample have body and texture scores more than 6, this indicated that all sample were liked slightly on 20<sup>th</sup> day. But <italic>khoa</italic> samples were not subjected to sensory evaluation due to visibly spoilage of samples on 25<sup>th</sup> day storage.</p>
<p>There were significant decreases in color and appearance scores of <italic>khoa</italic> in each treatment with time during storage. This might be due to increase in microbial counts during storage. Microbial contamination produced undesirable effects e.g. change in color, odour, taste and texture of the product (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R7">Goyal and Srinivasan, 1984</xref>). The results were in agreement with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R1">Acharya and Agrawal (2010)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R9">Jain <italic>et al</italic>. (2015)</xref>, who also reported significant decrease in body and texture score of <italic>khoa</italic> and <italic>kalakand</italic>, respectively during storage at 25<sup>&#x00BA;</sup>C. However, body and texture of all treatments did not differ significantly on same day of storage. Every treatment had sensory score more than 6 (i.e. slightly liked) till end of 20<sup>th</sup> day of storage.</p>
<p>All natamycin treated <italic>khoa</italic> samples had higher body and texture scores, which might be owing to lower yeast and mould counts. Those <italic>khoa</italic> samples which were packaged under vacuum condition also had better body and texture score than simple packaged samples, which might be because of the reason that it did not allow atmospheric factors to distort the color and appearance of <italic>khoa</italic>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R11">Kumar <italic>et al</italic>. (2010)</xref> also noticed higher body and texture score in vacuum packaged <italic>khoa</italic> than simple packaged <italic>khoa</italic>. The samples developed by using milk solids had slightly lower body and texture score as compared to full cream buffalo milk <italic>khoa</italic>. Voghra and Rajoria (1983) also reported lower body and texture score for <italic>khoa</italic> prepared from milk powder than buffalo milk <italic>khoa</italic>.</p>
<table-wrap id="t3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Body and texture score of <italic>khoa</italic> at room temperature (23&#x00B1;2&#x00B0;C) (Mean&#x00B1;S.E., n=12)</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JAR-11-01-0173-f003.jpg"/>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="t4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Flavor score of <italic>khoa</italic> at room temperature (23&#x00B1;2&#x00B0;C) (Mean&#x00B1;S.E., n=12)</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JAR-11-01-0173-f004.jpg"/>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Flavor</title>
<p>There were non-significant differences in flavor scores of all treatment on 0<sup>th</sup> day of storage and similar trend were observed till the 10<sup>th</sup> day of storage at room temperature (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). On 5<sup>th</sup> day of storage flavor scores ranged 7.67 to 7.92, although all value differed non-significantly. Sensory panelist awarded highest flavor score to C<sub>3</sub> (7.58) and scores ranged 7.17 to 7.58 on 10<sup>th</sup> day of storage.</p>
<p>On 15<sup>th</sup> day, flavor score of C<sub>3</sub> (7.33) was found significantly (P&#x2264;0.05) higher than T<sub>5</sub> (6.75). Scores for each sample were observed more than 7 except T<sub>1</sub> (6.92), T<sub>5</sub> (6.75) and T<sub>8</sub> (6.92). According to flavor score all <italic>khoa</italic> samples were liked moderately except three samples (T<sub>1</sub>, T<sub>5</sub> and T<sub>8</sub>) those were liked slightly.</p>
<p>Flavor scores of all treatments ranged 5.83 to 6.83 on 20<sup>th</sup> day. Flavor scores of C<sub>3</sub> were reported significantly (P&#x2264;0.05) higher than T1 (6.17), T5 (5.83), T6 (6.00), T7 (6.25) and T<sub>8</sub> (6.17). Hence, depending on flavor score, all samples were liked slightly by sensory panel except T<sub>5</sub> which was neither liked nor disliked. Sensory evaluation was not performed on 25<sup>th</sup> day due to visible spoilage of sample.</p>
<p>There were significant decreases in flavor scores of <italic>khoa</italic> in each treatment during storage time. That might be due to increase in microbial counts during storage. Microbial contamination produces undesirable effects e.g. change in color, odour, taste and texture of the product (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R7">Goyal and Srinivasan, 1984</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R9">Jain <italic>et al</italic>. (2015)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R1">Acharya and Agrawal (2010)</xref> also reported decrease in flavor scores of kalakand and <italic>khoa</italic>, respectively during storage at 25<sup>&#x00BA;</sup>C. Every treatment had sensory score more than 6 (<italic>i.e.</italic> slightly liked) at end of 20<sup>th</sup> day of storage. All natamycin treated <italic>khoa</italic> samples had higher flavor score, which might be due to lower yeast and mould counts.</p>
<p>Those <italic>khoa</italic> samples which were packaged under vacuum condition had better flavor score than simple packaged samples. That might be because of the reason that it did not allow atmospheric factors to distort the flavor of <italic>khoa</italic>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R11">Kumar <italic>et al</italic>. (2010)</xref> also noticed the higher color and appearance score in vacuum packaged <italic>khoa</italic> than simple packaged <italic>khoa. Khoa</italic> samples prepared by using milk solids had slightly lower flavor score as compared to buffalo milk <italic>khoa</italic>. Voghra and Rajoria (1983) also reported lower flavor score for <italic>khoa</italic> prepared from milk powder than buffalo milk <italic>khoa</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Overall acceptability</title>
<p>Sensory panelist awarded highest overall acceptability scores to C<sub>2</sub> (8.50) while lowest to T<sub>7</sub> (8.17) on 0<sup>th</sup> day of storage (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>). Overall acceptability scores of all treatments were found more than 8 (i.e. liked very much). On each particular interval of storage overall acceptability score of all treatments differed non-significantly and that trend remained same till 15<sup>th</sup> day of storage. However, the overall acceptability scores were decreased continuously during the storage period.</p>
<p>On 5<sup>th</sup> day the overall acceptability score ranged 7.58 to 8.00. Overall acceptability score of T<sub>5</sub> was found lowest which differed non-significantly to all treatments. Overall acceptability score of all <italic>khoa</italic> samples were found more than 7 (i.e. liked moderately) on 10<sup>th</sup> day of storage. Sensory panelist awarded the highest score to C<sub>3</sub> (7.67) and lowest to T<sub>5</sub> (7.25). On 15<sup>th</sup> day the overall acceptability scores of <italic>khoa</italic> samples ranged 6.92 to 7.33. C<sub>3</sub> (7.33) had highest while T<sub>5</sub> (6.92) had lowest score but all value differed non-significantly.</p>
<p>Sensory panelist awarded overall acceptability scores ranged 5.92 to 6.92 on 20<sup>th</sup> day during storage study. Overall acceptability score of C<sub>3</sub> (6.92) was found significantly (P&#x2264;0.05) higher than C<sub>1</sub> (6.33), T<sub>1</sub> (6.17), T<sub>5</sub> (5.92), T<sub>6</sub> (6.08), T<sub>7</sub> (6.33) and T<sub>8</sub> (6.17). Depending on overall acceptability score, all <italic>khoa</italic> samples were liked slightly except T<sub>5</sub> on 20<sup>th</sup> day of storage. But on 25<sup>th</sup> day all samples were found spoiled, so not subjected to sensory evaluation.</p>
<p>There were significant decreases in overall acceptability scores in each treatment during storage period. This might be due to microbial growth responsible for discoloration and lipolytic defects in <italic>khoa</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R7">Goyal and Srinivasan, 1984</xref>). Microbial contamination produces undesirable effects e.g. change in color, odour, taste and texture of the product.</p>
<table-wrap id="t5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Overall acceptability score of khoa at room temperature (23&#x00B1;2&#x00B0;C) (Mean&#x00B1;S. E., n=12)</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JAR-11-01-0173-f005.jpg"/>
</table-wrap>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R9">Jain <italic>et al</italic>. (2015)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R1">Acharya and Agrawal (2010)</xref> also reported decrease in sensory score of <italic>kalakand</italic> and <italic>khoa</italic>, respectively during storage at 25&#x00B0;C. However, overall acceptability of all treatments did not differ significantly on same day of storage. Every treatment had sensory score more than 6 (i.e. slightly liked) at end of 20<sup>th</sup> day of storage.</p>
<p>All natamycin and nisin treated samples had higher overall acceptability scores, which might be due to lower yeast and mould counts. Those <italic>khoa</italic> samples which were packaged under vacuum conditions had better overall acceptability score than simple packaged sample. This may be because of the reason that it did not allow atmospheric factors to distort the sensory properties of <italic>khoa</italic>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R11">Kumar <italic>et al</italic>. (2010)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R19">Sharma <italic>et al</italic>. (2001)</xref> also revealed higher overall acceptability score in vacuum packaged <italic>khoa</italic> than simple packaged <italic>khoa</italic>. The samples developed by using milk solids had slightly lower overall acceptability scores as compared to full cream buffalo milk based <italic>khoa</italic>. Voghra and Rajoria (1983) also reported lower color score for <italic>khoa</italic> prepared from milk powder than buffalo milk <italic>khoa</italic>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>CONCLUSION</title>
<p>The present study revealed that the milk solids (SMP, cream and <italic>ghee</italic>) could be very well used to prepared <italic>khoa</italic> which was comparable to from full cream buffalo milk based <italic>khoa</italic> and also met the legal standards. Natamycin at the levels of 10 ppm and nisin at 100 IU/g were found equally effective in extending shelf-life of <italic>khoa</italic>. In addition, vacuum packaging also significantly maintained sensory quality. Bio-preservative treated and vacuum packaged <italic>khoa</italic> samples were organoletically acceptable up to 20 days at room temperature (23&#x00B1;2 &#x00B0;C).</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS</title>
<p>The authors are thankful to Head of Department, Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary &#x0026; Animal Sciences, Hisar for providing necessary facilities.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<ref id="R1"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Acharya</surname>, <given-names>P.P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Agrawal</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2010</year>. <article-title>Effect of packaging materials and modified atmosphere packaging on the shelf-life of</article-title> <source>khoa. Nepal J. Sci. Technol</source>., <volume>11</volume>: <fpage>87</fpage>-<lpage>94</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R2"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Agarwal</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Rachappa</surname> <given-names>S.B.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2006</year>. <article-title>Finished product quality and safety.</article-title> <source>All India Dairy Business Directory, pp.</source> <fpage>97</fpage>-<lpage>105</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R3"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><collab>DAHDF</collab>. <year>2018</year>. <source>Annual report, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying &#x0026; Fisheries, India</source>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R4"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>De</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2004</year>. <source>Outlines of dairy technology</source>, <edition>19</edition><sup>th</sup> edition, <publisher-name>Oxford publishing Company</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New Delhi</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R5"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Delves</surname>, <given-names>B.J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>L.V.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Doan</surname> <given-names>C.H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Davidson</surname>, <given-names>P.M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2005</year>. <article-title>Natamycin.</article-title> In: <source>Antimicrobials in Food</source>, <edition>Third</edition> Edition. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><surname>Davidson</surname> <given-names>P.M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Sofos</surname> <given-names>J.N.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Branen</surname> <given-names>A.L.</given-names></string-name> (eds)</person-group>. <publisher-name>CRC Press; Tailor and Francis Group</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Baca-Raton-USA</publisher-loc>: pp. <fpage>275</fpage>-<lpage>287</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R6"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>FSSAI</surname> <given-names>.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2011</year>. <source>Akalank&#x2019;s food safety and standards Act, rules and regulation.</source> <publisher-name>Akalank publication</publisher-name> <fpage>224</fpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R7"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Goyal</surname>, <given-names>G.K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Srinivasan</surname>, <given-names>M.R</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>1984</year>. <article-title>Microbiological quality of fresh khoa samples</article-title>. <source>Asian J. Dairy Res.,</source> <volume>3</volume>: <fpage>114</fpage>-<lpage>116</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R8"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gupta</surname>, <given-names>R.K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Prasad</surname>, <given-names>N.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Prasad</surname>, <given-names>D.N.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>1989</year>. <article-title>Use of nisin in dairy industry</article-title>. <source>Indian Dairyman</source>, <volume>41</volume>(<volume>7</volume>): <fpage>229</fpage>-<lpage>233</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R9"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Jain</surname>, <given-names>V.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Prasad</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Jha</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Gautam</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2015</year>. <article-title>Effect of modified atmospheric packaging on the shelf life of kalakand and its influence on microbial, textural, sensory and physico-chemical properties</article-title>. <source>Food Sci. Technol</source>., <volume>52</volume>(<volume>7</volume>): <fpage>4090</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4101</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R10"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Jung</surname>, <given-names>D.S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Bodyfelt</surname>, <given-names>F.W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Daeschel</surname>, <given-names>M.A.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>1992</year>. <article-title>Influence of fat and emulsifiers on the efficacy of nisin in inhibiting Listeria monocytogenes in fluid milk</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci.</source>, <volume>75</volume>: <fpage>387</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>393</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R11"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kumar</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Beniwal</surname>, <given-names>B.S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Rai</surname>, <given-names>D.C.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2010</year>. <article-title>Effects of antioxidants on shelf life of khoa under refrigerated conditions</article-title>. <source>Egyptian J. Dairy Sci</source>., <volume>38</volume>: <fpage>211</fpage>-<lpage>218</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R12"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kumar</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Up-Gradation of khoa Production and Preservation Technologies</article-title>. <source>Smriddhi-Asian J. Phys. Sci. Eng. Technol.</source>, <volume>3</volume>(<issue>1</issue>): <fpage>1</fpage>-<lpage>6</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R13"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Londhe</surname>, <given-names>G.K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Pal</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Raju</surname>, <given-names>P.N.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2012</year>. <article-title>Effect of packaging techniques on shelf-life of brown peda, a milk based confection</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci. Technol.,</source> <volume>47</volume>: <fpage>117</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R14"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Nath</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Chowdhury</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Sarkar</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Dora</surname>, <given-names>K.C.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2013</year>. <article-title>Lactic Acid Bacteria &#x2013; A Potential bio-preservative in sea food industry</article-title><source>. Int. J. Adv. Res.</source>, <volume>1</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>471</fpage>-<lpage>475</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R15"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Nelson</surname>, <given-names>J.A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Trout</surname>, <given-names>G.M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>1964</year>. <source>Judging Dairy Porducts</source> <edition>4</edition><sup>th</sup> Edn. <publisher-name>Olson Publ. Co.</publisher-name> <publisher-loc>Nilwankee</publisher-loc>, pp. <fpage>296</fpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R16"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Prasad</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Jha</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Jha</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2012</year>. <article-title>Textural and sensory characteristics of market samples of peda manufacture in Varanasi city of India</article-title>. <source>J. Dairying Foods Home Sci.,</source> <volume>31</volume>(<issue>4</issue>): <fpage>239</fpage>-<lpage>243</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R17"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Rabee</surname>, <given-names>A.O.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Heba</surname>, <given-names>H.S.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2017</year>. <article-title>The inhibitory Effect of Natamycin and Potassium Sorbate on Mold Growth in Egyptian Fresh Soft Cheese (Tallaga Cheese)</article-title>. <source>Alexandria J. Veterinary Sci.</source>, <volume>53</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>33</fpage>-<lpage>37</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R18"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><collab>Sandhya</collab>. <year>2010</year>. <article-title>Modified atmosphere packaging of fresh produce: current status and future needs</article-title>. <source>Food Sci. Technol.,</source> <volume>43</volume>: <fpage>381</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>392</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R19"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sharma</surname>, <given-names>H.K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Singhal</surname>, <given-names>R.S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Kulkarni</surname>, <given-names>P.R.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2001</year>. <article-title>Effect of packaging under vacuum or under nitrogen on the keeping quality of</article-title> <source>danedar khoa. Int. J. Dairy Technol.,</source> <volume>54</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>107110</fpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R20"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Snedecor</surname>, <given-names>G.W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Cochran</surname>, <given-names>W.G.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>1994</year>. <source>Statistical method</source>, <edition>8</edition><sup>th</sup> edition, <publisher-name>Oxford and IBAS publishing Company</publisher-name> <publisher-loc>Calcutta</publisher-loc>, pp. <fpage>172</fpage>-<lpage>196</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R21"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Soumya</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Indumathi</surname>, <given-names>K.P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Arora</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Sharma</surname>, <given-names>V.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Singh</surname>, <given-names>A.K.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2015</year>. <article-title>Detection of calcium based neutralizers in milk and milk products by AAS</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci. Technol.,</source> <volume>52</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>1188</fpage>-<lpage>1193</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R22"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Thomas</surname>, <given-names>L.V.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Delves</surname>, <given-names>B.J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2001</year>. <article-title>Applications of the natural food preservative natamycin</article-title>. <source>Res. Advan. Food Sci</source>., <volume>2</volume>: <fpage>1</fpage>-<lpage>10</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R23"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Vogrha</surname>, <given-names>V.R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Rajorhia</surname>, <given-names>G.S.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>1983</year>. <article-title>Utilization of dried milk for khoa making</article-title>. <source>Asian J. Dairy Res.</source>, <volume>2</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>113</fpage>-<lpage>118</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>