Paul and Mukhopadhyay
Influence of soil properties on variability of
References
different forms of sulphur
AderichinȱPGȱ1960.ȱTranscriptȱofȱFirstȱInternationalȱCongressȱ
ResultsȱrevealedȱthatȱtotalȱNȱaloneȱcontributedȱtoȱ25ȱ
ofȱSoilȱScience,ȱMadison,ȱUSȱ2,ȱ281.
perȱcentȱvariationȱinȱtotalȱSȱinȱsoilsȱ(Tableȱ7).ȱInclusionȱ BasumataryȱA,ȱDasȱKNȱandȱBorkotokiȱBȱ2010.ȱInterrelationshipȱ
ofȱsulphurȱwithȱsoilȱpropertiesȱandȱitsȱAvailabilityȱIndexȱinȱ
ofȱclayȱasȱanotherȱvariableȱimprovedȱtheȱpredictabilityȱ
someȱrapeseedȱgrowingȱlnceptisolsȱofȱAssam.ȱ Journal of the
byȱ33ȱperȱcent.ȱTheseȱtwoȱsoilȱparametersȱtogetherȱ
Indian Society of Soil Science 58 :ȱ394-402.
withȱ CBD-Fe,ȱ pHȱ andȱ organicȱ carbonȱ collectivelyȱ
Basumatary,ȱAnjaliȱandȱDasȱKNȱ2012.ȱFormsȱofȱsulphurȱandȱ
accountedȱforȱ38ȱperȱcentȱvariationȱofȱtotalȱSȱinȱsoils.ȱ
theirȱ relationshipȱ withȱ soilȱ propertiesȱ inȱ someȱ soilsȱ ofȱ
Organicȱsulphurȱalsoȱfollowedȱaȱsimilarȱpatternȱtoȱ
NorthȱBankȱPlainȱzoneȱofȱAssam.ȱ Agropedology 22 (1):ȱ43-49.
thatȱofȱtotalȱsulphur,ȱwhereinȱaboveȱsaidȱproperties,ȱ DayȱPRȱ1965.ȱParticleȱFractionationȱandȱParticle-sizeȱAnalysis.ȱ
exceptȱ withȱ soilȱ pH,ȱ conjointlyȱ contributedȱ toȱ aȱ
In:ȱMethodȱofȱsoilȱAnalysisȱ(C.ȱA.ȱBlack)ȱAgronomyȱNo.ȱ9,ȱ
Partȱ1.ȱ American Society of Agronomy ȱMadison.ȱWI,ȱpp.ȱ545-
maximumȱ 37ȱ perȱ centȱ ofȱ itsȱ variationȱ inȱ soils.ȱ Theȱ
567.
collectiveȱ influenceȱ ofȱ organicȱ carbon,ȱ silt+clay,ȱ
Foxȱ RL,ȱ Olsonȱ RAȱ andȱ Rhoadesȱ HFȱ 1964.ȱ Evaluatingȱ theȱ
CBD-Fe,ȱ CBD-Al,ȱ pHȱ andȱ CBDȱ (Al+Fe)ȱ contentȱ
sulphurȱstatusȱofȱsoilsȱbyȱplantȱandȱsoilȱtests.ȱ Soil Science
accountedȱforȱonlyȱ23ȱperȱcentȱvariationȱinȱavailableȱ
Society of America Proceedings 28 :ȱ 243-246.ȱ http://dx.doi.
Sȱ inȱ soils.ȱ Similarlyȱ organicȱ carbonȱ contentȱ aloneȱ
org/10.2136/sssaj1964.03615995002800020034x
causedȱ16ȱperȱcentȱvariationȱinȱadsorbedȱsulphurȱasȱ Gomezȱ KAȱandȱGomezȱAAȱ1983.ȱStatisticalȱproceduresȱforȱ
againstȱtheȱcollectiveȱcontributionȱofȱ25ȱperȱcentȱbyȱ
agriculturalȱresearch.ȱ2ndȱEd.ȱIRRIȱLos.ȱBanos,ȱPhillipines.
silt+clay,ȱtotalȱN,ȱoxalate-Fe,ȱoxalate-AlȱandȱsoilȱpH.ȱ Isitekhaleȱ HHE,ȱ Abohȱ SIȱ andȱ Oseghaleȱ ESȱ 2013.ȱ Sulphurȱ
Statusȱ Ofȱ Someȱ Soilsȱ Inȱ Edoȱ State,ȱ Nigeria.ȱ International
Thisȱindicatedȱthatȱtheȱorganicȱcarbonȱandȱsilt+clayȱ
JournalȱofȱScientificȱandȱTechnologyȱResearch 2 (6):ȱ91-95.
wereȱpredominantȱsoilȱpropertiesȱinȱinfluencingȱtheȱ
JatȱJRȱandȱYadavȱBLȱ2006.ȱDifferentȱformsȱofȱsulphurȱandȱtheirȱ
variabilityȱofȱadsorbedȱsulphurȱinȱtheseȱsoils.ȱInȱheatȱ
relationshipȱwithȱpropertiesȱofȱEntisolsȱofȱJaipurȱDistrictȱ
solubleȱform,ȱorganicȱcarbonȱcontributedȱtoȱonlyȱ11ȱ
(Rajasthan)ȱunderȱmustardȱcultivation.ȱ Journal of the Indian
perȱcentȱofȱtheȱvariationȱandȱinclusionȱofȱsilt+clayȱandȱ
Society of Soil Science 54 ,ȱ208-212.
totalȱNȱasȱotherȱtwoȱvariablesȱresultedȱtoȱimproveȱtheȱ Khalidȱ R,ȱ Khanȱ KS,ȱ Akramȱ Z,ȱ Qureshiȱ Rȱ andȱ Gulfrazȱ Mȱ
predictabilityȱonlyȱuptoȱ15ȱperȱcent.ȱFreeȱironȱoxideȱ
2011.ȱ Relationshipȱ ofȱ Plantȱ Availableȱ Sulphurȱ withȱ Soilȱ
Characteristics,ȱRainfallȱandȱYieldȱLevelsȱofȱOilseedȱCropsȱ
(CBD-Fe)ȱandȱCBD-Alȱaccountedȱforȱ10ȱperȱcentȱofȱ
inȱPothwarȱPakistan,ȱ Pakistan Journal of Botany 43 (6):ȱ2929-
variationȱinȱwaterȱsolubleȱSȱandȱinclusionȱofȱtotalȱNȱ
2935.
intoȱtheȱequationȱresultedȱtoȱimproveȱtheȱpredictionȱ
Ogehȱ JS,ȱ Uzuȱ Fȱ andȱ Obi-Ijehȱ ODȱ 2012.ȱ Distributionȱ ofȱ
valueȱbyȱ12ȱperȱcent.ȱHowever,ȱinclusionȱofȱtotalȱNȱ
SulphurȱinȱSoilsȱFormedȱfromȱDifferentȱParentȱMaterialsȱ
andȱpHȱcontributedȱtoȱexplainȱonlyȱ13ȱperȱcentȱofȱitsȱ
inȱSouthernȱNigeria.ȱ Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied
variationȱinȱsoils.
Science 20 (1):ȱ73-77.
PageȱAL,ȱMillerȱRHȱandȱKeeneyȱRDȱ1982.ȱIn:ȱMethodsȱofȱSoilȱ
Conclusion
Analysis.ȱPart-II.ȱChemicalȱandȱMicrobiologicalȱPriperties.ȱ
Amercian Society of Soil Science ȱMadison,ȱWisconsin,ȱU.ȱSȱA.ȱ
Resultsȱobtainedȱinȱtheȱpresentȱinvestigation,ȱthus,ȱ
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jpln.19851480319
revealedȱ thatȱ distributionȱ ofȱ differentȱ Sȱ formsȱ PatelȱJCȱandȱPatelȱKCȱ2008.ȱProfileȱdistributionȱofȱdifferentȱ
inȱ surfaceȱ layerȱ ofȱ soilsȱ isȱ greatlyȱ influencedȱ byȱ
formsȱofȱsulphurȱinȱprominentȱsoilȱseriesȱofȱSouthȱGujarat.ȱ
soilȱ propertiesȱ andȱ inter-relationshipsȱ amongstȱ
Asian Journal of Soil Science 3 (1):ȱ24-31.
themselves.ȱ Organicȱ Sȱ inȱ soilȱ constitutesȱ theȱ mostȱ
PatelȱJM,ȱPatelȱMV,ȱJadavȱNJȱandȱPavayaȱRPȱ2011.ȱDistributionȱ
ofȱdifferentȱformsȱofȱsulphurȱinȱsoilȱofȱBanaskanthaȱdistrictȱ
predominantȱfractionȱandȱoccursȱasȱtheȱmajorȱnativeȱ
ofȱGujarat,ȱ An Asian Journal of Soil Science 6 (1):ȱ11-16.
Sȱreservesȱinȱsoils.ȱAmongȱtheȱsoilȱproperties,ȱorganicȱ
Paulȱ SCȱ andȱ Mukhopadhyayȱ Pȱ 2009.ȱ Formsȱ andȱ Statusȱ ofȱ
carbon,ȱtotalȱN,ȱsilt+ȱclay,ȱCBD-extractableȱAlȱandȱFeȱ
Sulphurȱ inȱ someȱ Soilsȱ ofȱ Teraiȱ Regionȱ ofȱ Westȱ Bengal.ȱ
showedȱ toȱ haveȱ majorȱ influencesȱ onȱ variabilityȱ ofȱ
Environment and Ecology 27 (4):ȱ1521-1523.
availableȱSȱinȱtheseȱsoils.
PaulȱSCȱandȱMukhopadhyayȱPȱ2014.ȱFormsȱofȱsulphurȱandȱ
evaluationȱtoȱtheȱsulphurȱtestȱmethodsȱforȱmoongbeanȱinȱ
356