The price of agricultural commodity shows seasonal nature with low price immediately after harvest which increases gradually to reach maximum just prior to next harvest. The price of sweet orange and lime also exhibits strong seasonality due to their seasonal nature of production and higher perishability which may exacerbate the poverty of small holding farmers but also can increase the profit of farmers if it can be properly utilized. However, the knowledge about seasonal price movement of these fruits in Nepal is inadequate. Thus, this study was conducted to analyze the seasonal price variation and business opportunities of Lime and Sweet oranges in Nepal which may be useful in developing appropriate policy response for price stabilization. The ratio-to-moving average method was used to study the seasonal price variation and business opportunities. The results from this study revealed the strong seasonal nature of price movement with the highest seasonal index in Baishakh for lime and Ashad for sweet orange whereas the lowest seasonal index for lime and sweet orange in Poush and Kartik respectively. The magnitude of price variability was high and the gross storage return for both lime and sweet orange was also higher. Similarly, the wholesale price of sweet orange and lime showed significant and increasing trend. This concludes that the earning from sale of lime and sweet orange is highly unstable due to the seasonal nature of their prices and the storage and sale of these commodity during the lean season of production would be profitable.
The price of both Lime and Sweet orange showed strong seasonal variation as well as significantly increasing trend during the study period.
The storage of both lime and Sweet Orange would be profitable as indicated by the gross storage return.
Seasonal fluctuation is one of the most important and well-known features of agriculture. Seasonal variation is regularly recurring pattern which is completed every 12 months (Sahu, 2018). Seasonal price variability is the change in price level over time and it is one of the major problems affecting agriculture sector (Barmon & Chaudhury, 2012). The price of agricultural commodity is determined by production and availability (Camara, 2013). The nature and supply of Agricultural commodity generally results in instable price and income in agriculture sector (Sahu, 2018). Most of the agricultural produce; especially fruits and vegetables are highly perishable in nature and requires immediate marketing after harvest. Timely marketing of such commodities is essential to ensure freshness and quality to the consumers as well as return good price to the growers (Kumar, Sharma, & Singh, 2005). Price Variability in agricultural produce is mainly caused due to its inelastic demand, strongly seasonal nature of production and long production cycles (Barmon & Chaudhury, 2012; Camara, 2013). Timmer (2011) also argued that the price variability of agricultural commodity is influenced by factors such as supply limitation, emerging markets, increased demand and unrealized potential.
Farm price vary periodically and the price movement is similar from year to year (Rahn, 1968). The seasonal variation is the short time fluctuation occurring within a year in a time series data. Thus, the measurement of seasonal price variation is required to measure this fluctuation and determine the effect of season on price which in-turn help farmers for planning future production (Moniruzzaman, Islam, Sabur, Alam, & Alamgir, 2008).
Crop prices follow a general seasonal pattern with seasonal low at harvest followed by post-harvest increase. The price increases after harvest because of fixed supply and consumption depletes that supply causing price rise (Noonari
The seasonal nature of price variation was also reported in vegetables by many authors. Noonari
The perishability and seasonality of fruits is very high compared to other crops which leads to price uncertainty as the producer has no control over the price (Singh
Horticulture produce in Nepal are marketed through different types of markets, the most common being rural haat bazars where the producers and consumers are in direct relationship. The price of agricultural commodity including citrus changes with time. The price of citrus fruits is highly unstable and depends on the quantity supplied (Sulaiman, Doucha, & Kandakov, 2014). Citrus price varies with season due to seasonal nature of its production. The wholesale and retail price of lime and hill lemon also showed temporal and spatial variation in Nepal (Dhakal & Tripathi, 2005).
The high and unpredictable seasonal price variability creates uncertainty and increases risk for farmers traders, consumer and government and leads to poor decisions (Barmon & Chaudhury, 2012). This price variability may increase poverty among small land holding farmers (FAO, 2011). But it also can increase the profit of farmers if they decide to sell the price of their harvest when the price goes up (Kilima, Mbiha, Erbaugh, & Larson, 2013).
Price variation is an important component of profit which impact commodity investment behavior, farm income and food security and thus needs to be quantified. The fluctuation in price cannot be forecasted by farmers and the fluctuation of high magnitude has negative impact in farmers. When price of a commodity remains abnormally high for some time, the area under that commodity tends to increase as farmers are attracted towards it with the hope of getting high income which leads to oversupply and thus reduces price (Nsumba, 2017).
Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the seasonal nature of price movement of citrus fruits viz. Lime and Sweet Orange and to identify the temporal business opportunity in Nepal. The findings of this study will help farmers to understand seasonal pattern of citrus price and enable them to adopt appropriate production, storage and sale strategies as well as assist policy makers to identify seasonal change in price and prepare appropriate policy response.
The monthly wholesale price of lime and sweet orange from 2057 BS to 2076 BS was collected from Kalimati Fruits and Vegetable Market, the leading terminal wholesale market in Nepal for this study.
There are different methods to measure Seasonal nature of price variability. Ratio to moving average method to find seasonal index is the most widely used method of measuring seasonal price variation (Meera & Sharma, 2016). A seasonal price index indicates a typical price movement pattern i.e. the average seasonal price variation of commodities over a period of years and can be used as standard for comparison (Rahn, 1968). This method incorporates price effect of inflation, cyclic changes in production, technology change and thus eliminates variations other than seasonal factors such as trend, cyclical and irregular components (Rahn, 1968; Flaskerud & Johnson, 2000). It helps in making better buying, selling and storage decision and can be used to estimate profitability of crop storage (Rahn, 1968; Jayaramu, 2015).
For the estimation of seasonal index, a 12-month moving average was calculated as follows:
And the Center Moving Average (CMA) was calculated as:
Seasonal index is the ratio of observed value of price (Yt) to centered moving average.
Where,
Seasonal Price Variation was examined by calculating average seasonal index using monthly data where each month’s price/seasonal index (EA) was computed as the average of the same month’s seasonal index for all years included in the moving average time series. This is obtained by arranging the seasonal indices month-wise for each year and calculating the average for each month.
The indices are expressed as a percentage of the moving average price and adjusted to the base of 100 and is called Adjusted Seasonal Index or Grand Seasonal index (GSI). This can be done by multiplying each month’s average seasonal index by a correction factor as:
Where,
The magnitude of price variability was calculated as percentage of difference between highest and lowest de-seasonalized price in each year, as shown in following equation:
Where,
The de-seasonalized price was calculated by taking the ratio of actual price (
Furthermore, temporal business opportunity was identified using Gross real storage return (GRSR). Gross storage return is the price margin that exists between the seasons (Mani, Hudu, & Ali, 2018). This method does not take into consideration for the cost of storage (Nsumba, 2017). Return to storage is the difference between price today and the price for delivering on some future dates called forward price or future price (Alexander & Kenkel, 2012). Gross storage return (GSR) can be used to evaluate the feasibility of storage. Higher value of GSR indicates that the return to storage is higher in market and hence farmers can store commodity for future sale (Ngare, Simtowe, & Massingue, 2014).
The GSR can be calculated by computing the percentage increase from seasonal low to seasonal high of Gross seasonal Index (Ngare
The higher percentage of GSR meant the return to storage for lime and sweet orange was higher in market.
Seasonal Price pattern as indicated by GSI, 2057 BS -2076 BS
The Grand Seasonal Index (
The result of ANOVA applied to seasonal indices of lime revealed that there was significant difference among the months (p = 2 x 10-16) but no significant difference was observed among the years (p = 0.335) at 5 % level of significance.
The above findings corroborate with that of Dhakal and Tripathi (2005) which revealed the higher price of lime during off season of production that corresponds to summer seasons and further concluded that the wholesale price of lime was highest in April (Chaitra-Baishakh).
Similarly, the Grand Seasonal Index (
The result of ANOVA applied to seasonal indices of sweet orange revealed that there was significant Seasonal Price Variation of Lime and Sweet Orange difference among the months (p = 2 x 10-16) but no significant difference was observed among the years (p = 0.83) at 5 % level of significance.
Different pattern of de-seasonalized wholesale price of lime and sweet orange in Nepal is showed in
The result of Mann-Kendall test and Sen’s slope for variation in wholesale prices of lime and sweet orange is presented in
Trend of Wholesale Price of Lime in Nepal
Trend of Wholesale Price of Sweet orange in Nepal
Gross Storage Return (GSR) was computed for lime and sweet orange using information presented in
The result of GSR revealed that it was feasible to store both lime and sweet orange during the peak period of production and sell it when the price rises. It further revealed that there was a gross return of 56.25 % from storage of lime and sale when the price reach maximum. Similarly, there was about 52.06 % gross return from storage of sweet orange and sale during maximum price. This also showed that for a constant cost of storage, it was more profitable to store lime than to store sweet orange.
The study of the seasonal pattern and magnitude of wholesale price variability for sweet orange and lime was conducted using a ratio to moving average method. The findings from this study revealed that the monthly average seasonal indices for both lime and sweet orange were significantly different indicating the strong seasonal nature of their prices. It further showed that the seasonal indices for lime were above average in Chaitra, Baishakh, Jestha, Bhadra and Ashoj with the highest in Baishakh, which means that the wholesale price of lime was higher in these months with the highest in Baishakh and farmers are likely to earn more by selling lime during these months. However, the seasonal indices for lime were below average for remaining month with the lowest in Poush, which illustrates that the wholesale price of lime was lower in these months with the lowest in Poush and farmers are likely to earn low by selling their produce during this time. The variability of wholesale price for lime was 72 % which further concludes that farmers are more likely to have unstable earnings from the sale of lime during different months.
Similarly, the seasonal indices for sweet orange were above average in Baishakh, Jestha, Ashad, Shrawan and Poush with the highest in Ashad, that implies that the wholesale price of sweet orange was high during these months with highest in Ashad and farmers will make more earnings by sale of their produce during these months. However, the seasonal indices were below average in the remaining months with the lowest in Kartik, which means the wholesale price was lower during these months with lowest in Kartik and farmers are likely to make low earnings by selling sweet oranges during these months. The variability of wholesale price for sweet orange was 45 % concluding that farmers are likely to have unstable earnings from the sale of sweet orange. Also, it is evident from the highest percentage of wholesale price variability of lime compared to sweet orange, that the earnings from lime is likely to be more unstable that that from sweet orange.
Furthermore, the findings from the study of Gross Storage Return revealed that the storage of both lime and sweet orange was profitable and would yield a return of 56.25 % and 52.06 % respectively if they were to be stored and sold during the months of maximum price.
It is also evident from the study that the wholesale price of lime and sweet orange showed significant and increasing trend during the study period of 20 years from 2057 BS to 2076 BS.