To encourage JAM reviewers for timely and quality reviews on a regular basis, JAM has established the following policy on rating and awarding our reviewers for their time and effort.
1. Each reviewer can get a JAM reviewer certificate upon their request, once they have completed at least 5 JAM reviews.
2. After a reviewer certificate, the reviewer will be considered for the “JAM Reviewer Award” on the basis of score.
3. To provide reviewer score information for rewarding our outstanding reviewers, JAM Editor-in-Chief, score every reviewer at paper decision time. There are 3 scoring for handling editors to choose:
A. Excellent (90 - 100)
B. Good (70 - 89)
C. Below average (< 70)